On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Greg Hewett wrote:
> My experience has been that cyrus fails over pretty clean. Depending
> on the number of users, it might not make sense to reconstuct the
> databases at a time of fail over.
OK, thanks for the information - I've got some more questions:
- "fails over pre
We are going to set up a failover solution for a cyrus IMAP server with
two machines and a shared disk array (which holds a journaling file
system). Now I assume one machine has failed and the second one is taking
over the file system - is it safe to start cyrus on the second machine
immediately
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> I've thrown Cyrus IMAP 2.0.16 on ftp.andrew.cmu.edu. I didn't test
> the ancillary utilities as much as I would've liked (cyradm, etc.) but
> the base server should be solid.
>
> This version has some important db3 fixes, so I strongly encourage
Hi,
We have one problem with vacation and websieve: Users set their vacation
messages with websieve - the reply usually consists of several lines of
text. The problem is: The reply mail shows all lines queezed in one, while
the text looks OK in websieve.
We use Cyrus 2.0.14 and websieve 0.59.
A
