Re: MD5 Passwords in MySql?

2013-04-01 Thread Kari Hurtta
gt; Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ > List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ > To Unsubscribe: > https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus / Kari Hurtta Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2001-09-22 Thread Kari Hurtta
> In our configuration the set of users that can receive mail locally is > the contents of the assign file. > Messages are passed to deliver via the users' .qmail files. > > The transformation of the Return-Path happens after qmail has > handed off the message to cyrus for final delivery. > > We

Re: STARTLS falling back to version 1?

2001-08-28 Thread Kari Hurtta
[ On info-cyrus: ] > I am seeing strange behavior with STARTTLS falling > back to version 1 with outlook clients however when I > connect from localhost using openssl client command it > appears ready to do buisness using version 3. > I am using Cyrus 2.0.16 and OpenSSL 0.9.6 and am using > Outloo

Re: Help us! :)

2001-08-24 Thread Kari Hurtta
> Yikes... this isn't good news. The funny thing is that we had this > working just fine with the old IMAP server (1.5.24) using deliver with > Sendmail 8.12.0. Here is the cyrus section that we were using: > > Mcyrus, P=/usr/cyrus/bin/deliver, F=lsDFMnPqwA5@:|/, > S=EnvFromL, R

Re: Help us! :)

2001-08-24 Thread Kari Hurtta
> Okay, we just did that and we are still having problems. Mail can be > delivered to the INBOX just fine, but a "user+mbox@address" causes a > user unknown error and bounces the message back. That is quite natural because user+something does not exists on passwd. I think that you can not write

Re: [Cyrus imapd 2.0.12] STORE xxx FLAGS () (fwd)

2001-08-01 Thread Kari Hurtta
> Subject: [Cyrus imapd 2.0.12] STORE xxx FLAGS () > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:14:32 +0300 (EEST) > > Have I read RFC 2060 wrong ? > > I have understand that commands such as > > STORE 132 FLAGS () > > is valid. Specially grammar of RFC 2060 gives: stor

Re: SirCam and sieve

2001-08-01 Thread Kari Hurtta
[ This no longer match to subject of this mailing list. Sorry. ] > > And for that particular worm there's no need to match the body : > > /etc/procmailrc : > > :0 > > * ^ Content-Disposition: Multipart message > > /var/log/spam/sircam > > > > The Content-Disposition: Multipart message is inc

Re: Cyrus-imapd+sendmail

2001-07-27 Thread Kari Hurtta
> Hi all, > > I'm running hier FreeBSD 4.3 Release an I installed Cyrus-imapd with mysql > auth. > > Right now I'm testing the sending of mails to local mailboxes of cyrus, but > it doesn't work. > > Everytime I send an message I got the following failure message: > > Jul 27 16:58:05 test sen

Re: Vacation Sieve

2001-07-21 Thread Kari Hurtta
> Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the > local-part > of the address. I regularly recieve mail to my account in a mix of cases > and it > comes through fine. For example Sendmail can be case sensitive in the local-part of the address. / Kari Hurtta

Re: deadlines suck! <- imtest = zero response

2001-07-16 Thread Kari Hurtta
> imtest produces this line in /var/log/messages > > Jul 16 09:17:20 pico master[692]: process 698 exited, signaled to death by > 11 > > (as of now this is the only error message i've been able to produce in my > logs). If 11 is signal number, then it looks bad: [hurtta@leija ~]$ grep 11 /usr/

[Cyrus imapd 2.0.12] STORE xxx FLAGS () (fwd)

2001-06-25 Thread Kari Hurtta
-- /"\ | Kari \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign |Hurtta X Against HTML Mail | / \ | Have I read RFC 2060 wrong ? I have understand that commands such as STORE 132 FLAGS () is va