Hi,
On 18.04.2013 12:18, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
>>> 1) force syncronisation
>>> 3) manually run any remaining synclogs
>>
>> How do I do that / what's the difference between forced sync and a
>> manual sync log run?
>
> I me
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> > 1) force syncronisation
> > 3) manually run any remaining synclogs
>
> How do I do that / what's the difference between forced sync and a
> manual sync log run?
I mean that in the first case, you give a list of all your users
Hi,
On 18.04.2013 11:24, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45:03AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, failover is simply done by pointing clients
>> to the replica (e.g. moving public IP)?
>
> More or less. You'll also have to make sure sync_server
Hi!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45:03AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> If I understand correctly, failover is simply done by pointing clients
> to the replica (e.g. moving public IP)?
More or less. You'll also have to make sure sync_server is no longer running on
the replica but all the other relev
Hello,
If I understand correctly, failover is simply done by pointing clients
to the replica (e.g. moving public IP)?
We can assume that only one server is ever accessed by clients (both
IMAP and SMTP/LMTP), they only have access to the public IP, which is
switched over manually.
How do I then m
Hello Marc,
Thank you for your answer. I will go with virtual domains and separate
mailboxes
for now.
On 4/16/13 10:51 AM, Marc Patermann wrote:
> Valentin,
>
> Valentin Bud schrieb (16.04.2013 08:19 Uhr):
>
>> I am trying to figure out what would be a "best practice" when one
>> has a couple
