On 08/30/2012 10:00 PM, francis picabia wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael Menge
wrote:
Hi,
IMHO the mails have been marked as deleted, but not expunged by the
webmailer. Most clients will not show these mails by default and some
(e.g. Horde/IMP) count unread mails which are marke
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael Menge
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO the mails have been marked as deleted, but not expunged by the
> webmailer. Most clients will not show these mails by default and some
> (e.g. Horde/IMP) count unread mails which are marked as deleted in the
> summary view.
>
> B
Hi,
IMHO the mails have been marked as deleted, but not expunged by the
webmailer. Most clients will not show these mails by default and some
(e.g. Horde/IMP) count unread mails which are marked as deleted in the
summary view.
By exiting with Thunderbird these messages got expunged.
Regards
We've been running Cyrus imapd for many years and it is normally robust.
It is now on Redhat 5.8, using local storage.
A support call reported that in the webmail summary view, there
were over 130 unread messages, and yet the message list
could show only 8. The messages showing are the most
rece
Um, sorry, folks, I hit "send" before I had a look at the "To" header. This
should have gone to our local list only.
--Janne / Univ. of Helsinki
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> Tämä siis tiedoksi teillekin. Toki INBOX renamesta seuraavat jumitukset saa
> jatkoss
Tämä siis tiedoksi teillekin. Toki INBOX renamesta seuraavat jumitukset saa
jatkossakin korjatuksi, seuraavaan USER-operaatioon asti... :(
--Janne
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:33:18PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:25:08PM +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:25:08PM +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
> > What to do, how to circumvent this problem in the current version? I'd
> > really
> > like to be able to be able to start replicating a user's mailbox and
> > meta
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 12:46 +0200, zorg wrote:
> the documentation is not very clear to me
> If I want to use auxprop with ldapdb
> Do i have to store my user password in clear in ldap or is the another
> solution
Technically, no. Generally, yes.
I have some information & examples concerning ld