On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:57:14 +0300, Pascal Gienger
wrote:
> Just a little remark:
>
> We have > 4000 connections in IDLE state(*) and idled works flawlessly.
> I had some headaches because some members of this list pointed out that
> imapd was not tested for thousands of connections.
>
> It jus
Le 15/08/2011 17:28, David R Bosso a écrit :
>
> This is useful information, I was going to send out a query on idled
> experience because I recall that message a while ago stating that it was
> not well tested. Are there others using it on a large scale?
A "snapshot" of our load:
1. memstat;
#
This is useful information, I was going to send out a query on idled
experience because I recall that message a while ago stating that it was
not well tested. Are there others using it on a large scale?
Thanks.
-David
--On August 15, 2011 3:57:14 PM +0200 Pascal Gienger
wrote:
> Just a li
Just a little remark:
We have > 4000 connections in IDLE state(*) and idled works flawlessly.
I had some headaches because some members of this list pointed out that
imapd was not tested for thousands of connections.
It justs works.
Cyrus IMAPD 2.3.19.
(*) due to a heavily migration to Thunder
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Lucas Zinato Carraro
> wrote:
>
>> If i compile only quota utility from imapd 2.411beta1 and replace from
>> 2.4.10,
>> it will work ? Exist a change involving quota and binary imapd (proxyd) ?
Yes you can com
