> Helo,
> on a server ( debian 5.0 ) I installed three years ago cyrus 3.2.11 but
> I have never used
> now I wanted to install cyrus 2.4.10 but when I run the command
> /usr/cyrus/bin/ctl_cyrusdb -r I get :
>
> Fatal error: wrong db version
> segmentation fault
>
>
> it is possible that ctl_cyrus
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:31:39AM +0600, subscript...@innter.net wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote :
>
> > I think it's the 32bit vs 64bit issue. There's an open bug for it in
> > bugzilla.
>
> Thanks for info. I found this bug (3381). But now I have another question.
> I have 2 alternatives.
>
> 1
Bron Gondwana wrote :
> I think it's the 32bit vs 64bit issue. There's an open bug for it in
> bugzilla.
Thanks for info. I found this bug (3381). But now I have another question.
I have 2 alternatives.
1. I can change perl script that to use 32bit int (thanks to Leena Heino).
2. I can use patc
Helo,
on a server ( debian 5.0 ) I installed three years ago cyrus 3.2.11 but
I have never used
now I wanted to install cyrus 2.4.10 but when I run the command
/usr/cyrus/bin/ctl_cyrusdb -r I get :
Fatal error: wrong db version
segmentation fault
if on the same machine run ctl_cyrusdb of the ve
>> It is possible that I provide a patch.
>
> Yes please. This looks like a good solution.
Agreed. :)
--
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer / Office of Technology
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmad...@ivytech.edu
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: h
>
> Yes please. This looks like a good solution.
>
> Bron.
>
Ticket painfully created :
http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3499
Olivier ROLAND
AtoS
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
Simon Matter schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.3.16-5 (Packager: Simon Matter) on CentOS 5.6
> > (I'm currently not updated to 2.4 because there are know bugs in the
> quota
> > command)
>
> 1) the "quota bug" has existed for years, a workaraound is to run quota
> -f
> twice.
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, subscript...@innter.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found that C and Perl versions (tools/rehash) of dir_hash_c have
> different results. For part of mailboxes.
>
> Perl code :
>
> $n = 0;
> foreach my $b (split(/ */, $auth_user)) {
>$n = (($n << 3) ^ ($n >> 5)) ^ ord($b);