On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> That's expected, because it's a "prefix", not a "user".
>
> But - you have a good point. If we make it user rather than
> prefix, then it avoids a bunch of problems. I'm sold. Will
> be an interface change, but meh.
IMO, if we want prefix, we should
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:28:21PM +0300, Eero Hänninen wrote:
> Thanks Bron! Seems working now.
> Only side effect is that, now it will fix quotas for user.name* not
> only for user.name :)
>
> cyrus@mh14$ /usr/lib64/cyrus/bin/quota -f user.guns
> user.guns: quota root (none) --> user.guns
> user
Hi..
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:14:01 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:29:56 +0200, Eero Hänninen
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi..
>> >
>> > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:24:00 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011
Folders on the disk has the same name:
drwx-- 2 cyrus mail 848 12. čec 03.01 Kamil &AQw-ern&AP0-/
So it is up to squirrelmail to "deencode" it ?
Thanks
J.K.
Cituji Bron Gondwana :
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:12:30AM +0200, Josef Karliak wrote:
Hi there,
when I copied (an
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't see what NOOP can do to tell the client
> that the mailbox has gone away, because RFC3501 says it ALWAYS
> SUCCEEDS[tm]. Maybe we should ask Mark.
>
Hey Bron,
we had discussed this over IRC for a bit...
Since a NOOP can result in the server returni
