Re: in place upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4?

2011-04-09 Thread Carl Brewer
On 9/04/2011 11:09 PM, OBATA Akio wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:40:50 +0900, Carl Brewer wrote: > >> G'day, >> I'm running Cyrus imapd on NetBSD (pkgsrc), my current version is >> 2.2.13, and I figure it's about time to bump it to 2.4 (.7 ATM). Via >> pkgsrc I can build it, but am a bi

Re: Deliver to mailbox problem with v2.4.7

2011-04-09 Thread Dan White
On 09/04/11 22:33 +0100, John wrote: >Sorry for delay in responding, I have been away. > >Setting "anyone p" made no difference: > >localhost.localdomain> sam user/john anyone p >localhost.localdomain> lam user/john >john lrswipcda >anyone p > >localhost.localdomain> sam user/john/folder.name/subfo

Re: Deliver to mailbox problem with v2.4.7

2011-04-09 Thread John
On 07/04/11 22:43, Dan White wrote: > On 07/04/11 23:23 +0100, John wrote: >> On 07/04/11 22:06, Dan White wrote: >>> 'deliver' should deliver to the user's INBOX if it believes there's a >>> permissions problem, or if it believes the mailbox doesn't exist. Does >>> syslog give you any hints? >>> >

Re: in place upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4?

2011-04-09 Thread OBATA Akio
Hi, On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:40:50 +0900, Carl Brewer wrote: > G'day, > I'm running Cyrus imapd on NetBSD (pkgsrc), my current version is > 2.2.13, and I figure it's about time to bump it to 2.4 (.7 ATM). Via > pkgsrc I can build it, but am a bit reluctant to do a make update, does > anyone have

in place upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4?

2011-04-09 Thread Carl Brewer
G'day, I'm running Cyrus imapd on NetBSD (pkgsrc), my current version is 2.2.13, and I figure it's about time to bump it to 2.4 (.7 ATM). Via pkgsrc I can build it, but am a bit reluctant to do a make update, does anyone have any experience with doing this in place on a current site? Will i

Re: acl

2011-04-09 Thread rosenberger
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 20:35:53 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:21:33PM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:17:37PM +0200, rosenber...@taoweb.at >> wrote: >> > But back to the question >> > I read out the acl from a mailbox >> > lrswipkxtecda >> > m