Re: 2.3's future?

2011-02-11 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:15:32PM +, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Jukka Huhta wrote: > > I filed a bug 3397 (replication & partitions), also reported in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu/msg39940.html. > > What are the odds to have it fixed in 2.3

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
André Schild wrote: > @bücher.ch is allowed. > In dns this is represented as a IDN encoded name in the form of*** > > xn--bcher-kva.ch* is the ACE string, and it is this string that is > entered in the DNS. > Fine, let me rephrase; The IDN<->ACE string conversion, while ASCII-only not being a

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread André Schild
Am 11.02.2011 15:06, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): André Schild wrote: > Hello, > > Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): > > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default > > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1. > > Sound OK for me. > > When chan

Re: 2.3's future?

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Jukka Huhta wrote: > I filed a bug 3397 (replication & partitions), also reported in > http://www.mail-archive.com/info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu/msg39940.html. > What are the odds to have it fixed in 2.3 or will it just be closed > with WONTFIX? > > If we don't count these few replication relate

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
André Schild wrote: > Hello, > > Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): > > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default > > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1. > > Sound OK for me. > > When chaning upper/lowercases we always have to consider character sets. > For the

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread André Schild
Hello, Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): Hi there, (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.) In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted as saying: "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox l

RE: XFER problems with 2.4.6

2011-02-11 Thread karavelov
 Ops, Attaching the config file I missed in the previous messageidlemethod: idled foolstupidclients: yes duplicatesuppression: no configdirectory: /var/lib/cyrus defaultpartition: default partition-default: /var/spool/cyrus/mail allowusermoves: yes altnamespace: no unixhierarchysep: yes munge8bit

XFER problems with 2.4.6

2011-02-11 Thread karavelov
Hello This week I have installed a second server with Cyrus 2.4.6 (from git.debian.org package) and I have found some unexpected behavior - I could move users from old installations (2.3.16) to the new servers but I could not move users between 2.4.6 servers. Here is an example session: stor1.i

Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Hi there, (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.) In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted as saying: "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes interoperability and is discouraged." The problem state