On 11/12/10 00:06, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote:
>> Hmm, allright, so I ran it with a truss (like strace for FreeBSD) to
>> give me a bit more verbosity, and I realized I should chown.
>>
>> But then:
>>
>> # chown cyrus 22003.
>> # sudo -u cyr
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:58:04PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> It _will_ write to stderr (aka fd 2). If we want to be safe, we make sure
> fds 0-2 are sane, and we check when we open sockets/files that we did not
> get fds below 3...
>
> > Bron ( a while later, fd 2 gets re-used a
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Gary Mills wrote:
> Isn't the modern design multiple threads, rather than multiple
> processes? That seems to me to be the right direction for Cyrus.
> It might even make for a simpler design.
Ehh... not realy. Multithreading means locking, futexes, and other pains. It
also m
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Since that wasn't the issue - why on earth was it allowed to have fd 2
> in the first place? Is Cyrus closing fd 2, or is truss closing it??
That is the issue that caused the leaks into protstreams, AFAIK. It is
always com-err writing to fd 2, and some
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:33:15AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Sorry - I've been busy working on the specific problem rather than the
> overview, and I realised I kind of glossed over this bit:
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:24:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > This probably nee
Sorry - I've been busy working on the specific problem rather than the
overview, and I realised I kind of glossed over this bit:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:24:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This probably needs a redesign of master/service fd-passing protocol,
> and of prot stream
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> Hmm, allright, so I ran it with a truss (like strace for FreeBSD) to
> give me a bit more verbosity, and I realized I should chown.
>
> But then:
>
> # chown cyrus 22003.
> # sudo -u cyrus /usr/local/cyrus/bin/reconstruct user.bla
>
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of Cyrus IMAPd version
2.4.4.
This is a stable released in the 2.4 series, containing a mere 5 bug-fixes
since version 2.4.3, released two days ago. Particular focus of this release
has been paid to upgrade paths, for which many of our users
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:24:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> > Uhoh! And then I looked at mailboxes.db: It looks like part completely
> > rewritten, including the skiplist header, and the first line now said:
> > user.bla: System I/O erro
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:24:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> > Uhoh! And then I looked at mailboxes.db: It looks like part completely
> > rewritten, including the skiplist header, and the first line now said:
> > user.bla: System I/O erro
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:24:47PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> > Uhoh! And then I looked at mailboxes.db: It looks like part completely
> > rewritten, including the skiplist header, and the first line now said:
> > user.bla: System I/O erro
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> Uhoh! And then I looked at mailboxes.db: It looks like part completely
> rewritten, including the skiplist header, and the first line now said:
> user.bla: System I/O error System I/O error
This is something that has plagued cyrus for a long time. Can we
Hi,
Maybe I've some more 2.4.3 badness:
I just decided to restore one message, and copied it from the archive.
Unfortunately, I didn't copy properly, so the ownership was root instead
of cyrus.
I then ran a
# sudo -u cyrus /usr/local/cyrus/bin/reconstruct user.bla
user.bla: System I/O error Syst
Hi Bron,
On 11-11-10 03:45, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:38:34PM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote:
>> On 10-11-2010 21:27, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>
(Can I downgrade? I just need to reconstruct everything, right, because
the index format changed? :-S)
>>>
>>> Yes, you will ne
14 matches
Mail list logo
