Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> 1. It would be nice from a provisioning standpoint to be able to enumerate
>> available partitions and their capacities within the IMAP protocol itself.
>> This
>> way, provisioning scripts could decide intelligently which backend and
>> partition
>> to use without resort
Robert Banz wrote:
> An extension or protocol enhancement is only good as the client
> implementations are -- and we know how successful that's been for
> other optional capabilities -- such as ACL management.
Almost nobody cares about ACLs, so almost nobody implements it (sad, but
true). I w
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> Some earlier versions of Cyrus had quota calculation issues with big
> quotas (2GB? 4GB?) or big mailboxes. I think there is a blurb in WMOGAG
> about that, and what version fixed it.
It happens with 2.2 crossing the 4GiB range, but not related to what he's
seeing.
An extension or protocol enhancement is only good as the client
implementations are -- and we know how successful that's been for
other optional capabilities -- such as ACL management.
On Jan 14, 2010, at 9:42 AM, kael wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 08:47 AM, Rob Banz wrote:
>> I would argue that it
Thanks for your quick reply.
On 01/14/10 01:32 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Wirstrom wrote:
>> We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
>> quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts show conflicting
>> information
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Wirstrom wrote:
> We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
> quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts show conflicting
> information based on the 'quota' command and how much space is taken up
> by the filesystem ('d
Hi,
We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts show conflicting
information based on the 'quota' command and how much space is taken up
by the filesystem ('du'). We have run 'quota -f' and 'reconstruct -r -f'
numerous
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> By which time, why not just define a brand new protocol not called IMAP which
> includes the good bits of what IMAP currently does, and discards anything that
> doesn't fit the multi-folder worldview. So long as you made the storage and
> meta-data requirements compatible w
Hi Guys:
A few days ago called for help about settings in Cyrus Aggregator.
Now I've a big problem with replica server.
My configuration is 1 backend, 1 murder, 1 frontend and 1 replica server.
When the backend server is online the replica server get all the mails
that reach the backend server.
On 01/06/2010 08:47 AM, Rob Banz wrote:
> I would argue that it's out of scope -- credential management should
> be taken care of by your credential management system, be it through a
> web interface or whatever. Even if it were to be an accepted spec, the
> chances of all of the client-write
10 matches
Mail list logo
