On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:01:28AM -0400, Brian Awood wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 @ 18:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >
> > Possibly the secret is that we use IPAddr2 from linux-ha to force
> > ARP flushes, and we transfer the primary IP address between
> > machines, so nothing else needs to
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 @ 18:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> Possibly the secret is that we use IPAddr2 from linux-ha to force
> ARP flushes, and we transfer the primary IP address between
> machines, so nothing else needs to know - we just shut down one end
> and bring up the other with the IP
Well, I figure this is interesting anyway - rough
statistics on how many folders users have, how
big their messages are, how much "churn" the folders
have.
Source code attached (including a copy of
IndexFile.pm which it requires to read the index
files)
I've tried to make it compatible with diff
Folks,
I set up cyrus sasl2 to work with postfix smtp server. I am able to send
e-mail by authenticating via sasl the first time after I start the saslauthd
process. When I send another e-mail, it doesn't work. I looked through
different logs, here is what I find:
1. Start saslauthd. I checked the
Maria McKinley wrote:
MMcK> while installing/updating to newest cyrus on the new machine
MMcK> I noticed lines like this:
> Creating/updating cyrus control directories in /var/cyrus/data...
> Creating/updating partition spool /var/cyrus/mail...
MMcK> which leads me to believe there are changes
brian wrote:
> You might want to consider doing a complete, fresh install and using
> imapsync to move the mailboxes from one machine to the other. That
> way, you'll know that the newer Cyrus has everything it needs and is
> up to date.
>
> I've only used it once but it worked flawlessly.
>
> ht
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó wrote:
> Hello,
> May I put the database file deliver.db in the /dev/shm partition.
>
> I have disabled duplicatesuppression and I believe that I will save lot of
> I/O
> requests to my hard drives if I put this file in memory.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:19:13AM -0400, Brian Awood wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 @ 06:59, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:33 -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > Really I've looked at fsck too many times in my life and
> > > don't ever want to again.
Hello,
My mail server is ancient, both in hardware and software, so I am
working on updating it. I started with a fresh install on a new machine.
My /var/cyrus directory is on its own hard drive. I copied everything
from the /var/cyrus directory onto a separate hard drive, which I
mounted on t
With my ever-growing experience with these things, I'm tending to
think that application-level HA solutions are a much more robust way
of dealing with the potential failure modes of hardware or software.
While this doesn't mean you shouldn't buy reasonably robust hardware
(not the cheapest
Simon Matter wrote:
What I'm really wondering, what filesystem disasters have others seen? How
many times was it fsck only, how many times was it really broken. I'm not
talking about laptop and desktop users but about production systems in a
production environment with production class hardware a
Bron Gondwana wrote:
It's an interesting one. For real reliability, I want to
have multiple replication target supported cleanly.
So the issues for me with Cyrus replication:
1) Is it working? Is the replica actually up to date
and more importantly what if I switch to it and there
is some
On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:39 AM, Georg Stich wrote:
> I use now a fresh installation wir php-pear-Net-Sieve 1.1.7 .
>
> Do i need install TLS /SSL Support on this System ( in postfix or
> somewhere else )
If you have TLS enabled in Cyrus for sieve, then you'll need to make
sure your PHP has TLS s
Hello,
May I put the database file deliver.db in the /dev/shm partition.
I have disabled duplicatesuppression and I believe that I will save lot of I/O
requests to my hard drives if I put this file in memory.
I'am right?
Which problems will I have with this file in memory?
I know that I will lo
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 @ 06:59, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:33 -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Really I've looked at fsck too many times in my life and
> > don't ever want to again. Anyone who tells me "oh yes but
>
> Especially not in the >100GB area.
We h
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
>> What I'm really wondering, what filesystem disasters have others seen?
>> How
>> many times was it fsck only, how many times was it really broken. I'm
>> not
>> talking about laptop and desktop users but about production systems in
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Does anyone has scripts/tools to - at least - simulate 1000s of
> (semi-realistic) parallel IMAP clients on a big setup?
Yeah, I've got one. I need to tidy it up a bit more though, and
they're a bit less realistic than I'd like.
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:33 -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
[...]
> Really I've looked at fsck too many times in my life and
> don't ever want to again. Anyone who tells me "oh yes but
Especially not in the >100GB area.
[...]
> The antiquated filesystems that 99% of admins tolerate and
> work with every
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> What I'm really wondering, what filesystem disasters have others seen? How
> many times was it fsck only, how many times was it really broken. I'm not
> talking about laptop and desktop users but about production systems in a
> product
Matt Selsky wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Georg Stich wrote:
>
>> I tried to patch all files described in the Bug Tracker Horde and
>> elsewhere. It doesnt. work. I got "Not in Authetication State" May be i
>> am a little confused about all, hmm .
>> Could anybody post a (simple) workarou
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Georg Stich wrote:
> I tried to patch all files described in the Bug Tracker Horde and
> elsewhere. It doesnt. work. I got "Not in Authetication State" May
> be i
> am a little confused about all, hmm .
> Could anybody post a (simple) workaround or howto get runnin
Hello again !
I tried to patch all files described in the Bug Tracker Horde and
elsewhere. It doesnt. work. I got "Not in Authetication State" May be i
am a little confused about all, hmm .
Could anybody post a (simple) workaround or howto get running ingo 1.2.1
or 1.22 with cyrus-imapd 2.3.1
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> I assume you mean 500 gigs! We're switching from 300 to 500 on new
>> filesystems because we have one business customer that's over 150Gb
>> now and we want to keep all their users on the one partition for
>> folder sharing. We don't do any murder though.
>>
>>
> Oops ye
23 matches
Mail list logo
