At Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:40:44 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails?
>
> Suggestions?
The answers will depend entirely on what platform one chooses and what
requirements one has for e-mail use.
Personally I'd suggest Mac OSX and Apple Mail as a first cut for an
Ben Carter wrote:
> Carson Gaspar wrote:
>> Ben Carter wrote:
>>
>> You have to do the _exact_ same thing with imapsync, unless you want
>> to lose email.
>
> As has already been pointed out, you are incorrect. The order is:
>
> [Pre-create inboxes with large quotas on new server]
>
> 1. Shut
Quoting Christophe Boyanique :
Hello,
I've got a problem with an old Cyrus installation: it is a 2.2.12
version on RedHat AS3 server which used to work correctly. It seems that
after a power failure, some mailboxes have been corrupted.
On 1000 mailboxes, 5 seem to be unreachable (for imap rea
Hello,
I've got a problem with an old Cyrus installation: it is a 2.2.12
version on RedHat AS3 server which used to work correctly. It seems that
after a power failure, some mailboxes have been corrupted.
On 1000 mailboxes, 5 seem to be unreachable (for imap reads or lmtp
deliveries) with this m
Garry wrote:
> Simon Matter wrote:
>> I think an easier way is to use the 'proxyservers' option to declare a
>> proxy user allowed to access all mailboxes. This user can then be used by
>> imapsync. I'm quite sure the archives hold detailed information on this as
>> I don't remember all the details
Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Ben Carter wrote:
>
>> If you use rsync, you have to stop everything until that finishes,
>> possibly reconstruct all mailboxes, maybe fix some other things before
>> giving people their mail functionality back and allowing mail delivery
>> to resume.
>
> That's just sil
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:40 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> --On 3 July 2009 14:09:19 -0400 "Greg A. Woods"
> wrote:
> >> There's pressure here to move to Exchange because it supports Outlook
> >> better.
> > Take away Outlook in effect by giving them better and different open
> > source and open sta
Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 3 July 2009 14:09:19 -0400 "Greg A. Woods"
wrote:
There's pressure here to move to Exchange because it supports Outlook
better.
Take away Outlook in effect by giving them better and different open
source and open standards tools and that pressure is sure to
Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
> --On 3 July 2009 14:09:19 -0400 "Greg A. Woods"
> wrote:
>
>>> There's pressure here to move to Exchange because it supports Outlook
>>> better.
>> Take away Outlook in effect by giving them better and different open
>> source and open standards tools and that pressure is
--On 3 July 2009 14:09:19 -0400 "Greg A. Woods"
wrote:
>
>> There's pressure here to move to Exchange because it supports Outlook
>> better.
>
> Take away Outlook in effect by giving them better and different open
> source and open standards tools and that pressure is sure to go away.
Suggest
10 matches
Mail list logo
