On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:07:02 +0200, "Rudy Gevaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> > Try a 2.6.20 kernel, just for an interesting datapoint. We changed
> > back to 2.6.20 (64 bit still) and haven't seen a corrupted seen file
> > since.
>
> I hope to try that still today.
>
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Try a 2.6.20 kernel, just for an interesting datapoint. We changed
> back to 2.6.20 (64 bit still) and haven't seen a corrupted seen file
> since.
I hope to try that still today.
I'm now running on 2.6.24-2, 32bit. I have cleaned up the users that
were having a corrupte
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:52:31AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> There you go. We've had the 64bit kernel approximately forever, but only
>> just upgraded from 2.6.20 series to 2.6.25.
>>
>>> I can try with a 32bit kernel tomorrow.
>
> Unfortunate with the 32bit kernel 2.6.2
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:29:01 +0200, "Rudy Gevaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>
>>> Are you running a 64 bit kernel?
>> Yes, but the system is 32bit (I run 64bit kernel + 32 emulation support)
>
> Interesting, so do we (on etch as well)
>
>>> (just
