On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:07:55 +0200 (CEST), "Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> greetings all.
> >>
> >> This morning a user called me saying that he was using reading his email
> >> (via squirrelmail) in one computer, then
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am delivering mail to cyrus from exim using lmtpd.
>
> Apparently lmtpd adds the Return-Path header only after the sieve
> scripts have been processed, because in the scripts I cannot match this
> header.
This was fixed back in 2.2. See
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> greetings all.
>>
>> This morning a user called me saying that he was using reading his email
>> (via squirrelmail) in one computer, then he logged out, and some time
>> later
>> went to another computer open squirrelmail, and his ma
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> greetings all.
>
> This morning a user called me saying that he was using reading his email
> (via squirrelmail) in one computer, then he logged out, and some time later
> went to another computer open squirrelmail, and his mail was gon
greetings all.
This morning a user called me saying that he
was using reading his email (via squirrelmail) in one computer, then he
logged out, and some time later went to another computer open
squirrelmail, and his mail was gone
I checked directly in
the mailstore and he had only a couple
Hi Maurizo,
Technically, even if you were using duplicate suppression it would not
be a huge loss to store it on a local filesystem.
You don't usually see duplicate id's unless someone's MTA goes
bonkers; or their MUA is stupid; oh and SPAM.
So yeah go for it, that'll save you a good deal of
> > Using the flat configuration for the mailbox.db the slow start
> > disapepars. May I use a flat database for 4300+ mailbox?
> > Do you think I could have other performance problems in
> > delivery/accessing the mailbox?
>
> I considered creating a GFS spool for a 5 mailbox system, but durin
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:48:32AM +0200, Maurizio Lo Bosco wrote:
> Hi all,
> Bron has analysed the problem of the low start and it seams due to the
> locking
> on the mailbox.db for each mailbox. Something like
> //for mailbox in $mailbox_list
> // lock mailbox
> // do something
> // unlo
Hi all,
Bron has analysed the problem of the low start and it seams due to the locking
on the mailbox.db for each mailbox. Something like
//for mailbox in $mailbox_list
// lock mailbox
// do something
// unlock
The lock/unlock seams to be a bottleneck for the GFS.
Using the flat configurat
