Re: reconstruct doing nothing

2008-03-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:36 +0100, "Alain Spineux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Gabor Gombas wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Bart Coninckx wrote: > > > > > >> Gabor, is this patch relevant when

Re: reconstruct doing nothing

2008-03-22 Thread Alain Spineux
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 22. > März 2008 11:29:36 +0100 regarding Re: reconstruct doing nothing: > > > > Conclusion > > > > > > - -r looks to be useless > > - -f

Re: reconstruct doing nothing

2008-03-22 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 22. März 2008 11:29:36 +0100 regarding Re: reconstruct doing nothing: Conclusion - -r looks to be useless - -f discover yet unknow folder, recursively too, but only inside new folder, not if already known, use * to for

Re: reconstruct doing nothing

2008-03-22 Thread Alain Spineux
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gabor Gombas wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Bart Coninckx wrote: > > > >> Gabor, is this patch relevant when I do get a result onscreen from > >> "reconstruct"? > > > > Without the patch, "reconst