Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
; Good point. I'm wondering if we need the struct at all, and can just use a
; union.
You're right, I've just tested the following and it works fine:
#define ALIGNBUF(buf, size) \
union { \
bit64 align8; \
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
; Good point. I'm wondering if we need the struct at all, and can just use a
; union.
You're right, I've just tested the following and it works fine:
#define ALIGNBUF(buf, size) \
union { \
bit64 align8; \
char buf[(size)]
Right, Frontend Proxd crashed and I also do not believe that this is a
physical connection problem.
The line is well monitored and not overloaded, not even under any "load".
After a "reconstruct" , which runs fine, the problem persists.
But an upgrade is not so easy. We use the original RPM pack
Pascal Gienger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> was there a special reason to "forget" the sleep(3) penalty timeout after
> an "invalid user" auth nak message?
>
> I did that because we had a POP3 client running wild while trying out
> unknown sasl users...
Imapd version is 2.3.9, diff -c is
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
> ; This patch tries to force the entire buffer to be aligned, rather than
> ; aligning each 64-bit field individually. Don't know if this will work or
> not.
>
> The concept seems to work fine. There are some other places that
> t
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
> > What value should I use to wild-card to every address?
>
> No sure out of the top of my head ... AFAIK wildcards are an extra
> module in Sieve, but not sure. If in doubt, try some RTFM. Or try with
> one address to start with, so see
> What value should I use to wild-card to every address?
No sure out of the top of my head ... AFAIK wildcards are an extra
module in Sieve, but not sure. If in doubt, try some RTFM. Or try with
one address to start with, so see some success in the first place. It
might be just *. You might ev
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
> Mike!
>
> I cannot see an :address parameter in your sieve script. Without that,
> you will never see any vacation response being generated! (Refer to 2.
> in my post.)
Duh, I expected the problem to be something simple, but I couldn't
Mike!
I cannot see an :address parameter in your sieve script. Without that,
you will never see any vacation response being generated! (Refer to 2.
in my post.)
Regards,
Torsten
Mike Eggleston schrieb:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
>
>
>>Hi Joseph,
>>
>>it would i
Hi,
was there a special reason to "forget" the sleep(3) penalty timeout after
an "invalid user" auth nak message?
I did that because we had a POP3 client running wild while trying out
unknown sasl users...
# diff pop3d.c.orig pop3d.c
1220d1219
< prot_printf(popd_out, "-ERR [AUTH] Invalid
Hi Joseph,
it would indeed be helpful if you posted the relevant section of your
sieve script. Nevertheless, two hints which might hopefully be useful:
1. Try to find out if anything in the chain between Sieve and your MTA
might be the issue. The easiest way to do that is to try some rejecting
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> it would indeed be helpful if you posted the relevant section of your
> sieve script. Nevertheless, two hints which might hopefully be useful:
>
> 1. Try to find out if anything in the chain between Sieve and your MTA
> m
Hi
Despite the error message, I dont thing this is a connection problem.
It looks like the "Fimap" crashed and closed the connection.
Try to "reconstruct" the mailbox(es) and see if the problem persist.
You could also try to upgrade to last imap version.
Anyway this is a bug, imap should not cra
Hello
maybe my posting last week was unclear:
Between our Murder frontend and backend are heavy connection problems:
---
>From log under /var/lib//logs//26754:
<11900211101190021110>* BYE Fatal error: Lost connection to selected backend^M
Im maillog:
master[26744]: service Fimap pid 26754
14 matches
Mail list logo
