Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi Rob,
This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
"clean" fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state gener
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Rob,
>
> This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
> "clean" fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state generally, not just
Robert Mueller wrote:
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX -> INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX emp
This usually happens because the lmtp connection got out of sync somehow.
There was a bug in older postfix's about this:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-04/1731.html
I haven't seen the problem since then since Wietse fixed it, but I'd try
setting lmtp_cache_connect=no in yo
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX -> INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX empty. If the server imp
I have found a link to a process that might be helpful:
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/Backup
Aside from this, we have done it the old fashion way: tar & zip on a
live system late at night. We just had a major server failure on
10/25/2006 which we were able to recover from.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Rafael Mahecha wrote:
I recently moved all my users from proprietary wemail (using local
sendmail) to latest cyrus and sendmail using lmtp.
I used to use tivoli to backup the old server (which was ok since no
data bases were involved)... but since cyrus has databases and s
I recently moved all my users from proprietary wemail (using local sendmail) to
latest cyrus and sendmail using lmtp.
I used to use tivoli to backup the old server (which was ok since no data bases
were involved)... but since cyrus has databases and such, I am concern about
file-locking and dat
On Dec 4, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
Really? Sendmail queries the SQL for each delivery recipient?
Potentially, but nscd caches the results. Sendmail also does
authenticated SMTP via SASL, just like Cyrus IMAP does it.
They are nicely integrated.
Clearly, there is an export mechani
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Is it possible to set any option(s) in cyrus.conf to have the imap listen
only to calls from within the subnet?
I want to enable admin logins from another machine in the subnet, but not
from external calls.
Or is it simply easier to add another addres
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Muenz, Michael wrote:
Dear list,
I'm using Horde/Ingo for creating sieve rules and have activated a rule for
Spamassassin moving mails with "X-Spam-Status: Yes" to spamfolder. Also,
there's a rule to forward every mail to another address. Looks like this:
require ["imapf
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:35:23PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
> >In our case there's no export involved. All of the information comes
> >from the same SQL database. Somebody reinventing this scheme today
> >would probably use LDAP instead.
>
> Really?
Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to over
>> quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
>
> ...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
> clean up or request
On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
Can you create a list of all of your users from some other
information?
If so,
1. Put a list of all of your domains in /etc/mail/virtual-domains
2. put each and every user in virtusertable
On Dec 4, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to
over
quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
clean up or request m
On Dec 4, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
In our case there's no export involved. All of the information comes
from the same SQL database. Somebody reinventing this scheme today
would probably use LDAP instead.
Really? Sendmail queries the SQL for each delivery recipient?
Clearly, there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
>I'm looking at a cyrus limitation right now. I'm really thinking this
>is not cyrus' problem. I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a
>sendmail limitation or a sendmail config error on
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
Ken, it's been another month. How can I help move this along?
Just popping up here to say that I run another site affected by this
bug and would love to see it resolved. If I had more than rudimentary
C skills, I would take a stab at a patch.
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:24 -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> >This solved my problem but it requires that I have a local machine account
> >for
> >each cyrus user. As a small domain that's not a problem for me, but others
> >might find it too restrictive.
>
> I'll test it. As long as by "local user
Is it possible to set any option(s) in cyrus.conf to have the imap
listen only to calls from within the subnet?
I want to enable admin logins from another machine in the subnet, but
not from external calls.
Or is it simply easier to add another address to the NIC and have it
listen to that one?
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:22:10AM -0600, Dave McCracken wrote:
>> As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little
>> sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp
>> time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time. I don't have such fu, but
>> I see now as
On 04.12.2006, at 17:11, Mirosław Jaworski wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 16:33 +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
I guess I can't do this in courier, as I would mess up the internal
db-structure.
Is there a way to (easily) do this in cyrus, without calling
cyrreconstruct?
Why this strange li
On Monday 04 December 2006 10:31 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
> As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little
> sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp
> time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time. I don't have such fu, but
> I see now as a good enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>Error" because the user doesn't exist. I have been googling and looking
>>at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check
>>the user at SMTP connect time the way it
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:28:56 -0500
Kevin Kruzich wrote:
Hi,
> I recently had to "migrate" a sasl auth db from GNU DBM to Berkeley
> DB. I used this:
>
> http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/convert-database
Mmmm why do I need to migrate? I just wondered how to recover my
broken db file.
> Als
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 16:33 +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
> I guess I can't do this in courier, as I would mess up the internal
> db-structure.
> Is there a way to (easily) do this in cyrus, without calling
> cyrreconstruct?
Why this strange limitation?
You can reconstruct specific mai
Hi cyrus-people,
I'm curious about the follwoing behaviour (this has not happened on
cyrus, but with courier):
A customer is sending a specific (bad) e-mail to 1000 mailboxes.
In courier I would write a little script, that greps in the
usermailboxes for something uniqe, move the file to /dev
Dear list,
I'm using Horde/Ingo for creating sieve rules and have activated a rule
for Spamassassin moving mails with "X-Spam-Status: Yes" to spamfolder.
Also, there's a rule to forward every mail to another address. Looks
like this:
require ["imapflags", "fileinto"];
# Spam
if header :comp
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to over
quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
clean up or request more space.
The trouble with smmapd is that it gives
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gary Mills wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:33:15PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>> Gary Mills wrote:
We've had excellent sendmail/cyrus integration for years, with
35,000 users. It's done by having all users in the NIS map on
the mail server.
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:57:18PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Gary Mills wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:33:15PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >>Gary Mills wrote:
> >>>We've had excellent sendmail/cyrus integration for years, with
> >>>35,000 users. It's done by having all users in the NIS map on
>
In one of our serveres we found bouces in local delivery, cyrus 2.2.12
and Postfix2.2.9.
The problem happends randomly: sometimes a mail is not delivered to a
mailbox. Then we get this error:
Dec 4 10:41:15 mail-server postfix/lmtp[24330]: E9BEA3B04EC:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, orig_to=<[EMAIL
Hi !!!
We have a big email server with about 2000 mailboxes, over SuSE 10.1
with SuSE 2.2.12. In order to enhace reliability and performance (over
slow 64 kbps internet links) we are moving to a distributed server schema.
So we set up a new server, and then tried to move some mailboxes to the
new
Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> My rudimentary understanding of sendmail macros makes me think that
> instead of checking for users locally, it's checking for user cyrus
> locally (which always succeeds), so the email is accepted for any user.
> If it's a problem with the older ver
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Gary Mills wrote:
>> We've had excellent sendmail/cyrus integration for years, with
>> 35,000 users. It's done by having all users in the NIS map on
>> the mail server. No modification to sendmail is necessary because
>> getpwnam() returns the passwd entry for the user. Users c
Gary Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I would like to know who is interested in helping to develop next
>>> versions of advanced Sendmail and Cyrus IMAP integration methods.
>>> I would like t
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check
> the user at SMTP connect time the way it does if I configure sendmail to
> deliver to a regular mbox mail spool.
Here's what a quick Google found:
http://comme
37 matches
Mail list logo
