Søren Schimkat wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I'm about to migrate from Solaris with Sendmail / uw to Redhat
> Enterprise Linux with Postfix / Cyrus. Everything seems to work just
> fine, but one unsolved question remains: Which filesystem should I choose?
>
> I really would like to use ext3 .. because i
After being mystified as to why I was getting "non-existent mailbox"
errors when trying to deliver via lmtpproxyd, I think I've found an
error in lmtpproxyd WRT unixhierarchysep (though it seems somewhat
improbable).
Specifically, in version Debian version 2.2.13-3, at line 683 of
lmtpproxyd.c, yo
On 2006-07-03 at 15:44 +0200, Daniel Eckl wrote:
> At the moment I have a temporary machine running the same system with
> reiserfs. While I still have the problem of occasional high load, the
> system now never freezes or hangs, just slowes down.
On my private machine at home, I used ReiserFS unt
That sounds promising, but sadly, CPU is not the problem. CPU usage I
can find with top and grepping the logfiles with the PID.
But the triggering client makes a high iowait, so load increases
dramatically while CPU usage stays low.
Best,
Daniel
Wesley Craig schrieb:
> On 03 Jul 2006, at 12:11,
Hi,
I did a check out of cvs tag cyrus-imapd-2_3. Can anybody confirm that
this is what used upstream? I eager to try the replication with virtual
domains. Ken made some adjustments to the code a couple of weeks ago.
I'm not sure how to compile it now. I can't find any good readme file.
F
On 03 Jul 2006, at 12:11, Daniel Eckl wrote:
I cannot identify the triggering client and/or the action it
starts
I have a set of patches to 2.2.x that adds per-user CPU logging. I'm
busying porting them forward to 2.3.x as we speak. Sadly, Linux
doesn't support getrusage(2) of more i
Well, I was surprised about the problem... I have only about 250
mailboxes on that server. But it's used extensively, because some users
have over 200 folders and an incredible mail count (mailboxes over 2 GB
of size).
I assume, my problem comes from Outlooks scanning all headers of a big
folder,
On 03 Jul 2006, at 11:35, Daniel Eckl wrote:
At this time I didn't change the scheduler. In fact, I actually
learned
about it a few days ago... So it was SuSE 9.3 default (might be
vanilla
default, don't know)
I think "anticipatory" is the default IO scheduler for SuSE 9.3 (from
Google).
At this time I didn't change the scheduler. In fact, I actually learned
about it a few days ago... So it was SuSE 9.3 default (might be vanilla
default, don't know)
What would you recommend for cyrus? (or for ext3 running cyrus)? And are
there prefered scheduler for other fs, too, especially reise
On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Daniel Eckl wrote:
I had this setup with ext3 before and I had severe problems with
extreme
load through high iowait and the system hangs for up to 20 seconds
while
the filesystem flushed unwritten data to disk.
This was on a SCSI hardware RAID 5.
Which IO schedu
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:24:15AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I was thinking too hard about this. The fix is trivial:
>
> https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/cyrus/imap/imapd.c.diff?r1=1.443.2.83&r2=1.443.2.84&f=u
That fixes it, thanks!
Andrew
--
Hi all,
I've a rather peculiar issue. I have a rather large archive of e-mails
in the cyrus imap format. But due to copy errors while migrating to the
cyrus server, I now have ended up with many many duplicate e-mails. And
I'd like to take these out.
These duplicates are the same down to the mess
I had this setup with ext3 before and I had severe problems with extreme
load through high iowait and the system hangs for up to 20 seconds while
the filesystem flushed unwritten data to disk.
This was on a SCSI hardware RAID 5.
At the moment I have a temporary machine running the same system with
On 6/30/06, Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Fisher wrote:
> I'm not aware of any existing patches that accomplish this sort of
> behavior. If we were to make these changes, would they be of use to
> other sites, and would such a design change be considered for
> acceptance upstr
Hi there,
I have a strange Problem with my new cyrus + sasl + postfix + mysql server.
Postfix accepts only mails to domains which were configured via
webcyradm. This tells me that postfix is configured correctly to access
the webcyradm-tables, although I don't get any errors in mysql-logs. I
Andrew Findlay wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:11:05PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
Cyrus IMAP v2.3.3 (with sasl v2.1.21) ran fine. Any ideas?
Can you get a backtrace from a core dump?
I have a similar problem using 2.3.6 murder on CentOS 4.3 (very like
RHEL 4) on 32-bit x86.
In my case i
Hi guys
I'm about to migrate from Solaris with Sendmail / uw to Redhat
Enterprise Linux with Postfix / Cyrus. Everything seems to work just
fine, but one unsolved question remains: Which filesystem should I choose?
I really would like to use ext3 .. because it's works great and seems
rock so
>>
>> What bug is this? Is it in bugzilla?
>>
>
> The thread from 26.05 : v2.3.6 message delete causes signal 10
Ah, right. This has been fixed in CVS for a while.
Hi next thing.
My master mupdate mailboxes.db has only 13MB
but synchronization last almost 1hour with speed about 30 kb/s.
Is
Hello All,
My "partition-default: /var/spool/imap" was mounted on RAID5 ACCUSYS hardware
raid.
It's very untrusted raid solution IMHO.
A couple of days ago one of the disks on this raid died and for some reason
this freezed my system completely.
I've copied the /var/spool/imap data to my syste
Wes Craig wrote:
I was thinking this:
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/AnonymousCVS
Wiki might be a good place to explain how CyrusIMAP's anonymous cvs
works, including which tags might be useful, but "Registration is
temporarily blocked due to spam attacks."
I have
20 matches
Mail list logo
