> I've finally split out all the patches that we use here into
> individual items.
>
> I know some people were interested in the "don't allow users to
> set the anyone ACL" patch as well.
>
> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
>
> Ken - I'd love to work with you on getting as many as possible of these
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:21 -0500, Marlys Nelson wrote:
> Larry Rosenbaum wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using more than 4GB of storage? Cyrus imapd 2.2.12 stores quota
> >
> >usage, in bytes, in an unsigned long and so can't keep track of usage over
> >4GB. You may need to go to v2.3.3, which uses a lo
I've finally split out all the patches that we use here into
individual items.
I know some people were interested in the "don't allow users to
set the anyone ACL" patch as well.
http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
Ken - I'd love to work with you on getting as many as possible of these
into upstream,
I have a patch set to ctl_mboxlist that outputs mailboxes.db on the
backend in a format that may be concatenated and reloaded on the
mupdate master. Using this method, we can rebuild our mupdate master
from the collective backends in a matter of minutes, even with >800K
mailboxes.
:wes
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:
haha, yup:) I should have been clearer.
I want to know the diff speed, not the rebuild speed.
So how long does ctl_mboxlist -mw take to run when the mupdate master is in
sync with the backend.
For example,
with backend and murder master in sync, ct
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:29, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Both clients I use show deleted messages with a line through them, and
> neither one is Outlook. Why would you call this ridiculous? It's easy
> to undelete by highlighting one and clicking undelete. And it reminds
> me they're still taking up
On May 22, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:
On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master
m
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:45, you wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is
> so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only
> to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?
> I'd much rather have closer control over w
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:
On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master mailboxes.db from
my backend server.
skiplist - 20-25
On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master
mailboxes.db from my backend server.
skiplist - 20-25 minutes
berkeley - 3 minutes
How many m
I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is
so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only
to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?
I'd much rather have closer control over what my mail program is
doing...
Jill William
--On Monday, May 22, 2006 10:13 -0600 Warren Turkal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way
you can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
No. The default in
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:13:56AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
> > Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
> > can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
>
> No. The default in Outlook wit
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:07 +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
I was wondering if there is a sieve proxy. I'm partitionnning my
userbase and redirecting every to the correct backup with perdition.
People who are doing the same. How are you redirecting sieve users to
the
On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
> Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
> can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just strikes out
the message in your messag
> hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:
>
>> > There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
>> > which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
>> > what you were after?
>
> however, thunderbird is not an option, cause o
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:07 +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> I was wondering if there is a sieve proxy. I'm partitionnning my
> userbase and redirecting every to the correct backup with perdition.
>
> People who are doing the same. How are you redirecting sieve users to
> the correct mailstore?
we
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:
> > There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
> > which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
> > what you were after?
however, thunderbird is not an option, cause of missing ca
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:13 +0200, Mirosław Jaworski wrote:
> Problems:
> - mupdate eating cpu
Update: seems that prot.c ( 1.82.2.13 ) patch made the day
for me ( concerning mupdate eating cpu time ).
Still have the problem with synchronizing mailboxes.db
between nodes though.
How often slave m
Hi,
I want to delete all mails in a folder from a script. How can I do
this. I triesd the ipurge command but there I have to specify what
mails.
Isn't it possible to tell ipurge it schould delete alle Mails in the
folder...?
Is there an other more elegant way to do this?
Regards,
Olli
20 matches
Mail list logo
