-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi all.
i've cyrus imap v2.2.12 on osx 10.4.3.
in my error logs, i'm seeing errors like:
devbox lmtp[11095]: Unknown Error Code: -###
where these error_codes are defined in: "./imap/imap_err.strings" as, generally
:
"KEManag
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:31:42 +0100
Jure Pečar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, on my production system I see some suspicious long pauses at
> fcntl64(0x8, 0x7, 0xsomeaddr, 0xsomeotheraddr) calls ... lets dig what this
> is.
As expected, these are from locking operations. 0x8 is file descr
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:41:03 -0500 (EST)
"John Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's worth repeating: With a single imapcopy process, the whole thing
> goes
> along pretty quickly, but drops off significantly with a second process and
> comes
> to basically a crawl with just 5 process
> It's situations like this Dtrace was made for. But on linux we still have
> to use some 'gut feeling' to figure it out ...
True. It's that sort of tool that I'm looking for, specifically to look into
concurrency on the skiplist db's, as the system load is so low that it seems
there's got to be
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:59:39AM +0100, Paul Dekkers wrote:
> >Make sure that you format ext3 partitions with dir_index which improves
> >large directory performance.
>
> ... but decreases read performance in general... at least that is what I
> found under RH / Fedora!
Yes, processing dire
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:00:08 -0500 (EST)
"John Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The disks are quite fast. bonnie++, for example, shows writes at over
> 300MB/s.
> What I'm finding though is that the processes aren't ever pegging them out --
> nothing ever goes into iowait. The bottleneck is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
Thanks to all who replyed.
I understand now that this are the hotmail and many other clients to blame for
these kind of headers.
But in reality I would like to deal with this problem (not just blame the
clients) via Cyrus (UW-IMAP and Exchange seem to deal
Hello All,
Thanks to all who replyed.
I understand now that this are the hotmail and many other clients to blame for
these kind of headers.
But in reality I would like to deal with this problem (not just blame the
clients) via Cyrus (UW-IMAP and Exchange seem to deal with the problem pretty
we
> We're running 'saslauthd -a ldap'...
Which I guess is irrelevant. When using gssapi authentication, Cyrus
never contacts saslauthd. So, I'm still puzzled, but I've got one
less thing to look at.
-- Lars
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew
> Have you tried running something like postmark
>
>http://packages.debian.org/stable/utils/postmark
>
> to benchmark your filesystem?
The disks are quite fast. bonnie++, for example, shows writes at over 300MB/s.
What I'm finding though is that the processes aren't ever pegging them out --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have very annoying problem since I've moved to Cyrus from UW-IMAP:
When someone sends e-mail from a number of servers to my users, and
Subject line is in hebrew, the only Subject they see on their Outlook
Express or
Horde IMP is Subject: XX
On the other
Hi,
--On 7. November 2005 13:40:05 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have very annoying problem since I've moved to Cyrus from UW-IMAP:
When someone sends e-mail from a number of servers to my users, and
Subject line is in hebrew, the only Subject they see on their Outlook
Express or Horde IMP
> Hello All,
>
> I have very annoying problem since I've moved to Cyrus from UW-IMAP:
>
> When someone sends e-mail from a number of servers to my users, and
> Subject line is in hebrew, the only Subject they see on their Outlook
> Express or
> Horde IMP is Subject: XX
>
> On the other han
Hello
All,
I have very
annoying problem since I've moved to Cyrus from
UW-IMAP:
When someone sends
e-mail from a number of servers to my users, and Subject line is in
hebrew, the only Subject they see on their Outlook Express
or
Horde IMP is
Subject: XX
On
Hi,
Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
I'd also be VERY interested since our experience was quite the
opposite. ReiserFS was faster than all three, XFS trailing a dismal
third (also had corruption issues) and ext3 second or even more dismal
third, depending on if
Ivan R. Sy Jr. wrote:
hi all
I got postfix->amavisd(with ClamAV and
SpamAssasin)->postfix->cyrus-imapd22 already running smoothly,
question now is, i want that the spam mails (already tagged in the MIME
headers) get delivered to the user's Bulk folder? Ive already set
autocreateinbox and au
Hi, I would just request that the tests and comments in this thread
should be added to the Cyrus wiki.
Kind regards,
Tarjei
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 02:46 -0200, Sergio Devojno Bruder wrote:
> David Lang wrote:
> >(..)
> > I was recently doing some testing of lots of small files on the various
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
