On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 23:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does this information help? What other info can I provide?
Yep. Can you please run 'vmstat 1' while the test is running, and
redirect the output to a file? vmstat can help spot all sorts of issues.
Also, what filesystem and disks are you u
AJ wrote:
I am using smmap to verify mailboxes w/ sendmail before delivery and I
am also using the following:
altnamespace: yes
unixhierarchysep: yes
In my logs, I see the following:
smmapd[6378]: verify_user(user.al) failed: Mailbox does not exist
Shouldn't this be user/al, since unixhierarchyse
Ok, so this is not really a big deal?
Ken Murchison wrote:
AJ wrote:
I am using smmap to verify mailboxes w/ sendmail before delivery and I
am also using the following:
altnamespace: yes
unixhierarchysep: yes
In my logs, I see the following:
smmapd[6378]: verify_user(user.al) failed: Mailbox does
I am using smmap to verify mailboxes w/ sendmail before delivery and I
am also using the following:
altnamespace: yes
unixhierarchysep: yes
In my logs, I see the following:
smmapd[6378]: verify_user(user.al) failed: Mailbox does not exist
Shouldn't this be user/al, since unixhierarchysep is enabl
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 02:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm really stumped here.
>
> I have two seperate machines... one very high end, dual CPU machine, raid
> 5, etc, the other is a piece of crud (standard low end workstation).
>
> Both machines are running Redhat Enterprise Server 3...
> the S
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Scanning time = 7/31/2004 1:05:26 PM
Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/1.947.00
Action on virus found:
The attachment docume
> More recent kernel versions have improved memory management and I
> wouldn't have expected RH ES 3.0 to be affected. What does top tell
> you? Does the load get high? How much CPU time do the kernel tasks use
> up?
> --
Top shows zero load on the machine (its just sitting there running cyrus
Hello all,
There will be no official release for the UoA patches for cyrus
imapd 2.2.8 since these would be identical with the patches for
cyrus 2.2.7. People with cyrus imapd 2.2.7 should upgrade to 2.2.8
and people with cyrus 2.2.8 could use the patches for 2.2.7 :).
The patches can be fo
Size En Doğru en Tarafsız en Güncel Haberleri Sunuyoruz Duvar Kağıtlarında İnanılmaz
Güzel Resimleri Bulacaksınız Başka Yerede Bir Benzeri yok.
Sesinizi Duyurun İlanlarınızı Ücretsiz Verin
Hemen Tıklayın www.akdenizim.net Akdenizin 1 Numaralı Portalı
not : bu mail bilgilendirme amaç
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gavin M. Bell
>
> I need a sendmail.mc file that I can use for letting sendmail
> know that I
> would like it to dump mail to cyrus.
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailers.html#cyrusv2mailer :)
You m
Hi,
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on Samstag, 31. Juli
2004 3:20 Uhr -0400 regarding Please help with Simon's Cyrus RPMS (2.2.8),
SMP, and really slow performance:
I have two seperate machines... one very high end, dual CPU machine, raid
5, etc, the other is a piece of crud (s
Size En Doğru en Tarafsız en Güncel Haberleri Sunuyoruz Duvar Kağıtlarında İnanılmaz
Güzel Resimleri Bulacaksınız Başka Yerede Bir Benzeri yok.
Sesinizi Duyurun İlanlarınızı Ücretsiz Verin
Hemen Tıklayın www.akdenizim.net Akdenizin 1 Numaralı Portalı
not : bu mail bilgilendirme amaç
I'm really stumped here.
I have two seperate machines... one very high end, dual CPU machine, raid
5, etc, the other is a piece of crud (standard low end workstation).
Both machines are running Redhat Enterprise Server 3...
the SMP machine is running the redhat 2.4.21-4.ELsmp stock kernel...
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
