Re: certificate probleme

2003-10-02 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 06:48:56PM +0200, ramblewski david wrote: > hello, > > I have cyrus-imapd-2.0.17 and cyrus-sasl-1.5.28_2 > currently installed on my box. > > I try to use the SSL/TLS and it works fine but every time I > fetch my e-mails I have this message in my logs: > > imapd[5744]:

Re: cyrus squirrelmail cant create folders permission denied

2003-10-02 Thread Jon Nelson
Run conf.pl and go to 2->A->9, which should be "Delimiter". Make sure this is set to "." without the quotes. Also when you are setting up/upgrading squirrelmail use: D. Set pre-defined settings for specific IMAP servers and choose "cyrus". It will save you a lot of headaches. Jon joe ri

cyrus squirrelmail cant create folders permission denied

2003-10-02 Thread joe ritter
Hello, We have a new cyus install running that our users access through squirrelmail. User can login and check mail OK. However if they attempt to create a new folder they reiceve the error message: "permission denied" Cyrus pretty much owns everything, all dbs, directories etc. When I tail the

Re: Murder Authentication Methods

2003-10-02 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:27:58PM -0400, Rob Siemborski wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > > > A question : is the 'proxy_authname' required to be admin on the > > > backend? Could it be just in proxyservers ? > > > > Yes. That's the

certificate probleme

2003-10-02 Thread ramblewski david
hello,   I have cyrus-imapd-2.0.17 and  cyrus-sasl-1.5.28_2 currently installed on my box.   I try to use the SSL/TLS and it works fine but every time I fetch my e-mails I have this message in my logs:   imapd[5744]: TLS engine: cannot load CA data   so I' ve added this lign in my imapd.co

Re: Murder Authentication Methods

2003-10-02 Thread Etienne Goyer
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:27:58PM -0400, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > > A question : is the 'proxy_authname' required to be admin on the > > backend? Could it be just in proxyservers ? > > Yes. That's the idea, in fact. Just to clarify : yes it have to be