Re: user unable to create sub-folders

2003-02-21 Thread cove
Hi Robert, I believe that the CREATE is actually being tried at the top level, and not under INBOX. Cyrus stores all of its users' email under INBOX. Try setting your inbox root to "INBOX" in your client... Cove On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 07:44 PM, Robert Urban wrote: Hello, i've just

user unable to create sub-folders

2003-02-21 Thread Robert Urban
Hello, i've just set up v2.1.12 on a RedHat 8.0 system using sasl2. I've created a single user (urban) using cyradm, and now I'm using Mozilla 1.0.1 ("the client") as MUA to test. The client is connecting to the IMAP server using TLS sucessfully. When the client tries to create the "Drafts" or

Re: beginner's question

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Hilts
> thing is: I can't log me in. Although Cyrus is up and running (telnet > localhost imap: "cyrus imap4 2.1.9 server ready"), when I try e.g. LOGIN > cyrus, it will say LOGIN BAD please login first. Just to be very clear, you can't just send LOGIN user pass and hope it works, you have to follow the

Re: beginner's question

2003-02-21 Thread David Chait
To be clear about this, you did create an account within Cyrus's db using cyradm, not just a system account correct? - Original Message - From: "Jochen Stärk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: beginner's question > hi there, > >

beginner's question

2003-02-21 Thread Jochen Stärk
hi there, I've installed Suse 8.1 professional and decided to go from uw imap with shadow authentication to the cyrus server that ship with suse. Well, the thing is: I can't log me in. Although Cyrus is up and running (telnet localhost imap: "cyrus imap4 2.1.9 server ready"), when I try e.g. LO

Re: LMTPD problems

2003-02-21 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 21 Feb 2003, James Miller writes: > Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Yes. Running the command "man procmailrc" will provide more details, if you need them. > It seems to me LMTPD is rejecting the messages because of header > problems. Only because what you are sen

Re: slow mailbox creation

2003-02-21 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:30:21 -0500 (EST) From: David A Powicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] This computer seems happy and fast in all respects, except for mailbox creations (4 seconds) and deletions (about 2 seconds) and ACL updates (2 seconds). A truss of an imapd that creates a

Re: LMTPD problems

2003-02-21 Thread Ken Murchison
James Miller wrote: > > Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have > MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some > of the headers that get added to all of our mail. > > X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mime

Re: LMTPD problems

2003-02-21 Thread Jason Englander
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, James Miller wrote: > Are there any know issues between cyrus and mimedefang? I run cyrus, sendmail, and MIMEDefang. I use the cyrusv2 mailer though, I don't use procmail. I've used it with procmail too, but it's been a while... ( and yes, the LOGFILE= part would go in the

LMTPD problems

2003-02-21 Thread James Miller
Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some of the headers that get added to all of our mail. X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.

slow mailbox creation

2003-02-21 Thread David A Powicki
Salutations, We are seeing slow mailbox creation times and are wonderin

Re: Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-21 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > I would have another question concerning MUPDATE. The white-paper on > Cyrus imapd Murder hinted about the possibility(1) of having your MUPDATE > server replicating. If it is available, I would like to replicate the > MUPDATE server for both scalabili

Re: Advice on transition

2003-02-21 Thread John Lederer
Robert Scussel wrote: There are actual multiple ways to do this. From what I understand you have 2 boxes, one the original server, and a new one. You may want to do this in two stages. Cyrus provides a lot of tools to upgrade between versions. That being said, you may want to replicate Cyru

Re: Two questions on MUPDATE

2003-02-21 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > First, the installation we are planning must support both POP (legacy) > and IMAP. Since the mailboxes will be spread on at least two imapd > backend, we will have a problem presenting a unified POP access. The > obvious solution would be to have diffe

Re: Advice on transition

2003-02-21 Thread Robert Scussel
The biggest thing when upgrading this way is if you change the type of layout that you want (ie. fullhashdir, etc.) however, since the distribution has tools to change things around (tools/rehash), I have found that converting the mailboxes a few times will not break anything too severely :) T

Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-21 Thread Etienne Goyer
Greeting again, I would have another question concerning MUPDATE. The white-paper on Cyrus imapd Murder hinted about the possibility(1) of having your MUPDATE server replicating. If it is available, I would like to replicate the MUPDATE server for both scalability and automatic failover, somewha

Two questions on MUPDATE

2003-02-21 Thread Etienne Goyer
Greeting, We are presently considering the use of a Cyrus imapd Murder for a somewhat large installtion (12K mbox now, expected to grow to 100K somewhen in the future). I would have two questions. First, the installation we are planning must support both POP (legacy) and IMAP. Since the mailbox

Re: Advice on transition

2003-02-21 Thread Robert Scussel
There are actual multiple ways to do this. From what I understand you have 2 boxes, one the original server, and a new one. You may want to do this in two stages. Cyrus provides a lot of tools to upgrade between versions. That being said, you may want to replicate Cyrus-2.0.16 on the new box,

Advice on transition

2003-02-21 Thread John Lederer
I currently have an olde version of cyrus working: name : Cyrus version: v2.0.16 vendor : Project Cyrus support-url: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus os : Linux os-version : 2.4.18-4GB environment: Cyrus SASL 1.5.27 Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.0.14: (November 18