As on version 2.1.11 i get cyrus up und running without any problem -
except cyradm. A call of cyradm brings out the mentionned error msg. if i
copy shell.pm in the path, a new prompt line results, nothing happens at
all.
Does anybody know about this issue? Is there another possibility to
administ
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Chris Scott wrote:
> Has anyone compiled this successfully on FreeBSD 4.7?
Try the /usr/ports/mail/cyrus-imapd2 port, I generated a 2.1.12 package
using it earlier today.
you stated that you want to have the outside box act as a secondary MX for
the inside one, if you do this and accept the extra bandwidth used then
you could still do this and have the mail only delivered to the inside box
and then replicated out to the outside one.
this doesn't solve the problem o
you need to change the to #include
in cyrusdb_db3.c
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:34:34PM -0500, Chris Scott wrote:
> Has anyone compiled this successfully on FreeBSD 4.7? I'm getting the
> following errors:
>
> gcc -c -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include
> -I/usr/local/include
lists wrote:
I am having 2 problems
1. is with the ./mkimap program.
I am using redhat 8.0 and I get this error
[cyrus@imap tools]$ ./mkimap
reading configure file...
done
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at (eval 1) line
85.
creating ...
Use of uninitialized value in
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:57:53 -0600, Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> One thing I was thinking of would be a hack to make one server always use
> only odd UIDs, and the other always use only even UIDs, and to do catchups
> while they are reachable with each other. But this is getting
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, lists wrote:
> I am using redhat 8.0 and I get this error
> [cyrus@imap tools]$ ./mkimap
> reading configure file...
> done
Have you set the 'configdirectory' parameter in your /etc/imapd.conf file?
It looks like mkimap isn't seeing one, so it's trying to use an empty
string
I am having 2 problems
1. is with the ./mkimap program.
I am using redhat 8.0 and I get this error
[cyrus@imap tools]$ ./mkimap
reading configure file...
done
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at (eval 1) line
85.
creating ...
Use of uninitialized value in mkdir at (eval
At 14:18 -0500 Robert Scussel wrote:
>I don't know about exim 3.35, but I know that exim 3.36 can use LMTP,
>which we use here.
er.. Exim 3.3x can use LMTP over a pipe (ie "deliver") or TCP/IP.
Exim 4.12 can deliver straight to the lmtpunix socket. Even less overhead
(and less packet filtering
> Has anyone out there used LVM with cyrus imap in an environment as
> large or larger than 1700 users? If so we'd love to hear about any
> lessons learned (i.e. "Don't do it!") or gotchas...
>
> Ben
See a message I posted earlier on a related topic:
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mai
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:08, Ben Poliakoff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're preparing to roll out a new cyrus mail system which will handle
> the bulk of our 1700 users' email. The server platform will be redhat
> linux 7.3 or 8.0.
>
> We'd like to use the Linux LVM (at the very least for the mail s
Has anyone compiled this successfully on FreeBSD 4.7? I'm getting the
following errors:
gcc -c -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include
-I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -Wall -g -O2 cyrusdb_db3.c
cyrusdb_db3.c:87: syntax error before `*'
cyrusdb_db3.c:87: warning: type
I don't know about exim 3.35, but I know that exim 3.36 can use LMTP,
which we use here.
The nicest thing about LMTP is the exim delivers straight, without
haveing to call cyrus's deliver. This leads to less overhead, and
better overall performance...
Also, we switched due to some odd problem
Hi all,
We're preparing to roll out a new cyrus mail system which will handle
the bulk of our 1700 users' email. The server platform will be redhat
linux 7.3 or 8.0.
We'd like to use the Linux LVM (at the very least for the mail store
itself) so that we can back up the system off of read only
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:55:04 -0600
From: Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm looking for the description of multiple domains in the archive
as someone mentioned. Is there a way to get a list of the threads
alone, and not all the messages, like in a fully collapsed form?
Since
Kerstin Espey wrote:
As long as you don't use the option "caseful_local_part" in the exim router,
exim will send all mails to the lowercase mailbox.
Regards,
Kerstin
Exim 4.x does not act this way, but Exim 3.x did. If you don't make specific
provisions to supply Cyrus a lowercase local part
Hi,
I need some basic information about authentification methods. Where can I find
easy to understand information?
Thank You
Peter
> However, had message IDs been the RFC822 message ID, then it would have
> been possible to receive new mail on each node. Since the IDs would not
> collide, that would be OK. If you did get the same ID delivered to both
> somehow, it should be the same mail. If not, it violates the RFC, so
> t
it from:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-imapd-2.1.12-ipv6-20030204.diff.gz
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Am Dienstag, 4. Februar 2003 15:45 schrieb Pål Olsen:
> I've just implemented a new mail platform using Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.11 and Exim
> 4.12, and I wonder... how to deal with the fact that systems don't allways
> do want you expect..?
>
> It seem to me that exim/cyrus has problem with delivery of mai
Thanks!
Pål
By the way: Do we have to set up this rule as an extra router, or can the
normal Cyrus delivery router take care of the convertion..?
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pål Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Fe
Well, for one, this requires change to Cyrus, which Phil doesn't seem to
want to do.
Also, it still doesn't solve the problem of flag changes.
-Rob
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> I've been sorta following this thread, and I don't claim to know a whole
> lot about programming, but
Pål Olsen wrote:
Hi,
I've just implemented a new mail platform using Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.11 and Exim
4.12, and I wonder... how to deal with the fact that systems don't allways
do want you expect..?
It seem to me that exim/cyrus has problem with delivery of mail if the
mail-address are written in ano
I've been sorta following this thread, and I don't claim to know a whole
lot about programming, but I'm wondering why something simple like what
I'm about to suggest wouldn't work... Here goes:
If a group of servers are gonna be in constant communication, why not just
have each server assign UI
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:51:21AM -0500, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
|
| >On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
| >
| >
| >>I wonder how well that method of replication works when both nodes
| >>cannot reach each other, and both are doing updates. And I wo
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:25:35AM -0500, Brian wrote:
|
| Phil Howard said:
|
| > What's curious to me is how, with a Maildir format, that IMAP could be
| > implemented to retain that state without either storing some extra data
| > or updating the files in place.
|
| Maildir has seperate fold
Hi,
I've just implemented a new mail platform using Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.11 and Exim
4.12, and I wonder... how to deal with the fact that systems don't allways
do want you expect..?
It seem to me that exim/cyrus has problem with delivery of mail if the
mail-address are written in another case than the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
I wonder how well that method of replication works when both nodes
cannot reach each other, and both are doing updates. And I wonder
They don't. If they cannot reach each other, at most one of them must allow
upd
Hello,
Where it is possible to find IMAP tests suite for the Cyrus server?
thanks a lot,
Konstantin.
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
> I wonder how well that method of replication works when both nodes
> cannot reach each other, and both are doing updates. And I wonder
They don't. If they cannot reach each other, at most one of them must allow
updates.
--
"One disk to rule them all,
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> CMU doesn't maintain any RPMs ourselves. Generally the Redhat/debian
> people are pretty quick about getting their respective packages updated.
As soon as I manage to find out just what is happening to ucd-snmp that
links in old libssl, and thus causes
Phil Howard said:
> What's curious to me is how, with a Maildir format, that IMAP could be
> implemented to retain that state without either storing some extra data
> or updating the files in place.
Maildir has seperate folders that contain the state of a message (cur,
new, tmp) where cyrus has
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:20:57PM +0900, Mark Keasling wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:19:12 -0600, Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
| > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:16:36AM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
| >
| > | On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
| > |
| > | > Does the RFC sa
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:19:27AM +, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
| Rob Siemborski wrote:
| > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
| >>| Doing replicated IMAP stores (espeically geographicly distanct ones) is
| >>| not an easy problem.
| >>
| >>It's easy if every message is a separate file.
| >
|
Hi Peter,
Sorry, I need your help.
I spend a lot of hours with my cyrus server, but I sill have no idea how to
solve my problem.
I cannot authenticate. I installed cyrus21-admin cyrus21-common,
cyrus21-imapd, sasl2-bin on a debian system.
I want to set up an autentification via sasldb, cause
On Tue 04 Feb 2003 at 11:00:10 +0700, you wrote:
> and rpm/srpms was done?
http://www.caliban.org/files/redhat
> Rob Siemborski([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:51:00PM -0500:
> > I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.12. This release
> > fixes a significant number o
Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
>>| Doing replicated IMAP stores (espeically geographicly distanct ones) is
>>| not an easy problem.
>>
>>It's easy if every message is a separate file.
>
> This is not true. It has nothing to do with the implementation of the
> mails
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:19:12 -0600, Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:16:36AM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> | On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
> |
> | > Does the RFC say that the IMAP UIDs have to be the file name?
> |
> | No, of course not.
> |
I'm looking for the description of multiple domains in the archive
as someone mentioned. Is there a way to get a list of the threads
alone, and not all the messages, like in a fully collapsed form?
Since I don't know what keywords to look for, I can't search, and
browsing topics is hard with the c
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:16:36AM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
| On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
|
| > Does the RFC say that the IMAP UIDs have to be the file name?
|
| No, of course not.
|
| > Do the IMAP UIDs have to be the same between different sessions?
|
| They cannot change with
Thank you for your answer. I'm using exim 3.35 from debian/stable. What is
the advantage of using lmtp? Is it nessassary to use lmtp?
I changed my cyrus version now to 2.1 Before I usesd version 1.6.
Am Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 18:25 schrieben Sie:
> Hi.. you don't say which Exim you're using. I
41 matches
Mail list logo
