[no subject]

2003-01-13 Thread k1680792
 

Re: lmtpd NUL rejection

2003-01-13 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:24:17 +1300 (NZDT) [...] Along the way, I've discovered a related bug in lmtpd (2.1.11). If a misconfigured client sends a message with lines longer than 8190 chars, the following code in imap/lmtpengine.c (lines 672-675) will incorre

Re: lmtpd NUL rejection

2003-01-13 Thread simon . brady
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > Have you tried F=1 mailer flag? This may only work in Sendmail 8.12.x. > > From op.txt: > > 1 Don't send null characters ('\0') to this mailer. We've gone live with 8.12.7, and F=1 is doing just what we hoped for: silently deleting NULs in transit.

Re: Per-Domain-Quota in 2.2 with virtual domains turned on ?

2003-01-13 Thread Ken Murchison
Christian Schulte wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question for 2.2-cvs and virtual domain support turned on. The > mailbox hierarchy mainly looks like a tree to me. Without virtual domain > support turned on I have the following hierarchy: > > /user/Accounts > /Shared-Folders > > With virtual dom

Print bad passwords feature request?

2003-01-13 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Would it be possible to add an option that makes cyrus print bad passwords in the log file? I know that there is a slight security issue with revealing the incorrect passwords that users attempt to use, bu

Per-Domain-Quota in 2.2 with virtual domains turned on ?

2003-01-13 Thread Christian Schulte
Hi, I have a question for 2.2-cvs and virtual domain support turned on. The mailbox hierarchy mainly looks like a tree to me. Without virtual domain support turned on I have the following hierarchy: /user/Accounts /Shared-Folders With virtual domain support turned on this expands to: /domain/

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Lawrence Greenfield wrote: Well, "message delivery" and "mailbox names" are tightly intertwined. How should I know that "leg+detail" should be delivered to "user.leg.Detail"? There is no historical usage that says imap folder names within a mailbox aren't case sensitive, so I would say leg+De

Re: Newbie questions

2003-01-13 Thread Ken Murchison
John Colton wrote: > > Hi, > > I just built and installed cyrus-imapd-2.1.11 and cyrus-sasl-2.1.10 under > RedHat 6.2 (yeah, I should upgrade). I've got some basic newbie questions: > * What auth mechs do NOT store plaintext passwords in sasldb2? OTP and SRP (if configured with --enable-srp-s

Re: Migration Pointers?

2003-01-13 Thread Jules Agee
If you're using Linux for a server of that size, you will definitely want an increase from the default number of open files your kernel will allow, i.e. put something like this in your rc.local file: echo 65536 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max My Cyrus box has ~18000 open files right now with 350 imapd

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:48:49 -0500 From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] There seem to be 3 places that have to be dealt with: 1) login 2) message delivery 3) mailbox names It seems like 1 is very localized and a trivial change in auth_canonifyid (if it

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Lawrence Greenfield wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500 From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes >usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive >everywh

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Lawrence Greenfield wrote: I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive everywhere else. I'm not sure this is a great idea. Maybe a global switch of case-sensitive mailbox names would make more sense (thus

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500 From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes >usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive >everywhere else. I'm not sure

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: > Maybe a global switch of case-sensitive mailbox names would make more > sense (thus LeG+detail -> user.leg.Detail, and "LEG" could log > in). I'm not sure, though. Nor am I. Should Cyrus do such a thing on its own? And if so, is this a 2.2-only typ

Newbie questions

2003-01-13 Thread John Colton
Hi, I just built and installed cyrus-imapd-2.1.11 and cyrus-sasl-2.1.10 under RedHat 6.2 (yeah, I should upgrade). I've got some basic newbie questions: * What auth mechs do NOT store plaintext passwords in sasldb2? * I understand how to test different auth mechs with 'imtest -m ' but how do I co

Migration Pointers?

2003-01-13 Thread Jared Watkins
Hello all... I'm working on a migration from a single linux Iplanet (aka Netscape aka Sun One) messaging server with Iplanet ldap backend for the user database TO cyrus on linux with an active directory backend. I have about 2500 accounts on this sytem.. and from the mta logs I go through abo

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:32:10 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote: > So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same > problem here with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a > solution that doesn't

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In message <20021226163734.GA5176@khazad-dum>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writ es: >On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote: >> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> >Here's the improved patch. It skip

Re: [PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (2)

2003-01-13 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote: > So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same problem here > with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a solution that doesn't require > me to patch either postfix or cyrus, if possible. Well, the patch proved itself stable, and it is in

All numeric usernames?

2003-01-13 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Is there any reason that cyrus doesn't allow all-numeric usernames? We have some legacy customers who have all numeric usernames, and I had to patch cyrus to allow usernames that are wholly numeric. Would

Re: [SOLVED] Re: STARTTLS negotiation failed

2003-01-13 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 13 Jan 2003, Steve Huston writes: > Finally got it! I followed the exact instructions in the manual for > creating a key, and for some reason that worked. Then I realized > one other thing I changed in the /etc/imapd.conf file when I used > that other key, that being "tls_ca_file:" It seems t

[SOLVED] Re: STARTTLS negotiation failed

2003-01-13 Thread Steve Huston
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 10 Jan 2003, Steve Huston writes: > > Now, our current Cyrus server has a self-signed cert which Pine > > doesn't like unless you add /novalidate-cert to the hostname of the > > server. But this time, that doesn't even help as it just says > > "The

Re: 2.2 stable release

2003-01-13 Thread Neal Rigney
FWIW, I've been using 2.2 in production since October with absolutely no issues. However, I haven't synced with the CVS tree for my production stuff since November, so I can't comment on the NNTP stuff. Also, I was unable to get Murder to work, but I'm pretty certain that was pilot error. On Sa

Re: presubscribing mailboxes

2003-01-13 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Earl Shannon wrote: An alternative is to authenticate as one user, probably the admin user, and be authorized to act on behalf of the account. That said, I don't know how to do this. If someone has an example of some perl code using the Perl IMAP Admin module that does this and is able to post i

Re: presubscribing mailboxes

2003-01-13 Thread Earl Shannon
Hello, An alternative is to authenticate as one user, probably the admin user, and be authorized to act on behalf of the account. That said, I don't know how to do this. If someone has an example of some perl code using the Perl IMAP Admin module that does this and is able to post it to the list

Re: Cyrus IMAP ; case studies, success stories, ... I need them

2003-01-13 Thread Piet Ruyssinck
Thanks a lot for all your testimonials. I appreciate it a lot, Piet -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Piet RUYSSINCKe-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systeem Administratie tel: +32 9 264 4733 Directie I

Re: No Mail Box

2003-01-13 Thread Simon Matter
Greg Sidleinger schrieb: > > Ok I don't know if this is a cyrus problem or a postfix problem but when Are you using postfix 2.x? Seems like postfix 1.x forces lower case while postfix 2.x doesn't anymore. Simon > ever I try to send email to a mail box with a odd case ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ) the

Re: Virtual mailboxes

2003-01-13 Thread Danny Garcia Hernandez
Hello Talking about virtual domains or virtual mailboxes. I have a linux box with sasl 2.1.9 and cyrus 2.1.9, Sasl was compiled with support for MySLQ like this. export LIBS="-lz" ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-krb4 --disable-gssapi --with-dbpat h=/etc/sasldb2 \ --with-dblib=berkeley -