Re: saslauthd performance anxiety

2002-12-31 Thread Igor Brezac
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've just upgraded to imapd 2.1.11, and while it's going fine so far I'm a > bit concerned about how it will cope under load when our students return. > > The problem is that I'm using the saslauthd native LDAP mechanism, and the > directory it's bind

saslauthd performance anxiety

2002-12-31 Thread simon . brady
I've just upgraded to imapd 2.1.11, and while it's going fine so far I'm a bit concerned about how it will cope under load when our students return. The problem is that I'm using the saslauthd native LDAP mechanism, and the directory it's binding to is quite slow (it's actually a slapd instance ru

Re: [Annoyed] Cyrus-imapd/sasl upgrade and lmtpd behaviour...

2002-12-31 Thread Scott Smith
huh...but I don't use Sendmail, so I never saw that :) So yes maybe moving it to a different spot in the documentation and making it a bit more generalized is a good idea, I agree. Scott -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ``Chews? I'll take charleston http://storm.lackluster.net/~scott/

Re: someoone are using saslauthd+ldaps?

2002-12-31 Thread simon . brady
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Felix Cuello wrote: > Someone are using saslauthd + ldaps?, because my saslauthd works fine > with LDAP but not with LDAPS... I can confirm that it works with SASL 2.1.10 / OpenLDAP 2.0.27 on Solaris 8. What sort of problems are you getting? Does ldaps in general work f

Re: SASLAuthD keeps dying.

2002-12-31 Thread simon . brady
On 29 Dec 2002, Oliver Jones wrote: > I think it is the TLS support of pam_ldap that is causing the core > dump. I ran saslauthd in a debugger and it seg faulted in > libcrypto.so.2 which is part of openssl. > > The interesting thing is that all my other pam related apps arn't > dumping core or

Re: [Annoyed] Cyrus-imapd/sasl upgrade and lmtpd behaviour...

2002-12-31 Thread simon . brady
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Scott Smith wrote: > What you probably want to do is add your MTA to the same group as Cyrus, > at most. [...] Cyrus / SASL peeps, can you DOCUMENT this, since I > personally know of several people that have had this problem, including > myself when I upgraded from 1.5.x :)

Re: make depend problems

2002-12-31 Thread simon . brady
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am trying to compile the latest version of Cyrus IMAPD and have some > problems already with the make depend, as you can see here in my output: > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/source/cyrus-imapd-2.1.11/imtest' > ### Making depend in /opt/sour

Re: Sendmail & Unix Hierarchy Sep

2002-12-31 Thread Ilan Rabinovitch
Ya this is definately a sendmail problem. I was hoping someone on this list had run into it before because for the life of me I cant figure out which flag I need to remove or add to solve this. Thanks, Ilan On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Simon Loader wrote: > I havent messed with send

Re: Sendmail & Unix Hierarchy Sep

2002-12-31 Thread Simon Loader
I havent messed with sendmail configs for a while (been using these new fangled MTA`s of late). Check the flags for your mailer is passing the full emial. Track down which line in the config the error is coming from becuase it looks like this is a sendmail problem. -- Simon Loader Ilan Rabinov

Re: Updating Cyrus

2002-12-31 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Víctor Guerra wrote: > Hello everybody, i want to update my cyrus-imap server from 2.0.16 to > 2.1.11 and i have two questions: > 1) What are the steps that i must do? Read doc/install-upgrade.html, doc/changes.html might also be interesting. > 2) Can I separat

make depend problems

2002-12-31 Thread marc . bigler
Hello, I am trying to compile the latest version of Cyrus IMAPD and have some problems already with the make depend, as you can see here in my output: gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/source/cyrus-imapd-2.1.11/imtest' ### Making depend in /opt/source/cyrus-imapd-2.1.11/perl gmake[1]: Entering d

Updating Cyrus

2002-12-31 Thread Víctor Guerra
Hello everybody, i want to update my cyrus-imap server from 2.0.16 to 2.1.11 and i have two questions: 1) What are the steps that i must do? 2) Can I separate mailboxes in diferent partitions depending of their first letter? (for example: if mailbox name is exampleAmydomaincom must be deliver