Re: Trouble with Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD

2002-12-23 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 03:30:15 + (GMT) > Darren Joy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: darrenj> with saslauthd disabled and pwcheck instead - partially successful, can darrenj> create entries in sasldb, can run cyradm, create mailboxes, log into IMAP darrenj> or POP from localhost, all wor

RE: Trouble with Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD

2002-12-23 Thread Hafiz Malik
hi there, i'm using freebsd 4.7 current and cyrus-imap-2, really work fine with me. if you are migrating from cyrus version 1, there are slightly differ in terms of imapd.sh daemon instead of placing the pop3 and imap4 in the inetd... then using perl-cyradm which cause slight changes to ur versi

Re: Trouble with Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD

2002-12-23 Thread Scott Smith
Yeah, install it by hand. It takes literally about 5 minutes. *shrug*... You didn't post any log entries, or what you've got in imapd.conf (using auxprop??? if you want sasldb2 you should be), or what your permissions on sasldb2 file are... Scott -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ``Chew

Trouble with Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD

2002-12-23 Thread Darren Joy
I'm having trouble getting a working implementation of Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD 4.7 CURRENT. And yes, I am using the ports, it just doesn't seem to work at all, rather annoying as I expected a "port" to just *work*. I've an existing 1.6.24 Cyrus IMAP installation, which works like a charm, however,

Re: peculiar lmtpd behavior

2002-12-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Frobbing with the lmtp code, I noticed this thread... On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kari Hurtta wrote: > > We believe it's this bit of code from savemsg() in lmtpengine.c: > > > > if (!strchr(rpath, '@')) { > > hostname = config_servername; > > } > > fprintf(f, "Return-

[PATCH][CVS IMAPd 2.1] lmtp_downcase_rcpt implementation (Re: Case Sensitivity)

2002-12-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." --

quick and dirty patch for flushing seen state

2002-12-23 Thread John A. Tamplin
Here is a quick and dirty patch for flushing the seen state whenever it changes, relative to 2.1.11. I have tested it on my production system and it seems fine, but use at your own risk. The quick and dirty part is that the interface to index_check doesn't provide a way to pass the quiet flag

Re: Case Sensitivity

2002-12-23 Thread Scott Smith
Hmmm, with 2.2 out of CVS, uppercase username works just fine... Scott -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ``Chews? I'll take charleston http://storm.lackluster.net/~scott/ chews for SIXTEEN MILLIONS!!'' On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Vernon A. Fort wrote: > With the current release of cyrus-im

Re: Case Sensitivity

2002-12-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote: > When the discussion came up on postfix-users after some folks found > this problematic, it was decided that it was wrong of the lmtp > client to forcibly downcase everything. Now we run into this fun. Bleh. They should have added an option so that we ca

Re: cyrus-2.2-cvs: virtualdomains and sendmail virtusertable (cyrusv2 as local mailer)

2002-12-23 Thread Joe Rhett
Christian, I really can't provide basic support for you on this problem. But rest assured that we are doing everything you are trying to do without any modifications to proto.m4. I really think you are over-working the problem. Virtusertable can easily map a name to a local alias (as you suggest

Re: Administrate Sieve?

2002-12-23 Thread Scott Russell
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 04:31:35PM -0500, Lee wrote: > We use an ldap directory with SSHA hashing on passwords stored in ldap > as the backend for our cyrus 2.1.X implementation. We are currently > trying to add a set of sieve scripts to EVERY user's account. Since we > cant actually access a us

Re: Case Sensitivity

2002-12-23 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:12:42 -0200, > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (hdmh) writes: hdmh> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Vernon A. Fort wrote: >> >> Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using the same version of postfix. >> hdmh> Well, as a workaround, use pipe delivery on postfix (and

Administrate Sieve?

2002-12-23 Thread Lee
We use an ldap directory with SSHA hashing on passwords stored in ldap as the backend for our cyrus 2.1.X implementation. We are currently trying to add a set of sieve scripts to EVERY user's account. Since we cant actually access a user's password (since they're hashed in ldap) I was hoping to

Re: Case Sensitivity

2002-12-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Vernon A. Fort wrote: > > Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using the same version of postfix. > Well, as a workaround, use pipe delivery on postfix (and thus, use the deliver Cyrus program, which is much slower than LMTP), and tell postfix to lowercase the recipient.

Re: DBERROR: skiplist recovery errors

2002-12-23 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:43:17 -0500 From: "John A. Tamplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have a user mailbox that is genering thousands of these same "DBERROR: skiplist recovery: should be ADD or DELETE" messages. This machine hasn't been rebooted, and Cyrus hasn't even been rest

Case Sensitivity

2002-12-23 Thread Vernon A. Fort
With the current release of cyrus-imapd-2.1.11, is there now case sensitivity on the lmtp delivery. With 2.1.10 and previous version, I could email VFORT and well as vfort and it would be delivered. I just (today) reinstall our mail server from: Cyrus-2.0.16 to cyrus-2.1.11 using

Re: DBERROR: skiplist recovery errors

2002-12-23 Thread John A. Tamplin
I have a user mailbox that is genering thousands of these same "DBERROR: skiplist recovery: should be ADD or DELETE" messages. This machine hasn't been rebooted, and Cyrus hasn't even been restarted since this particular user was converted (on the Cyrus side, conversion entails simply doi

Re: Problems creating mailboxes in 2.1.x

2002-12-23 Thread John A. Tamplin
Matt Sealey wrote: I've just set up my 2.x server and it's working great (authenticating and so on.. the most annoying part :) apart from mailboxes and folders. From a clean system (cleaned out folders, ran mkimap), if I log in as "cyrus", run cyradm, and cm user.bob, when I look at the list of

Sendmail & Unix Hierarchy Sep

2002-12-23 Thread Ilan Rabinovitch
Hello, I'm trying to get sendmail to work with Cyrus-Imap and UnixHierarchysep. Right now when e-mails come in sendmail only seems to pass on the 'user' part of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' so the mail never reaches the mail box I created for it. Any suggestions on how to fix this? Anyone have a sample se

[no subject]

2002-12-23 Thread mm
__ 12MB-POP3-WAP-SMS-AHTÈCÏAM--TOBA-E-mail.bG -- HOB ÁEÇÏËATEH AÄPEC - http://mail.bg/new/ --

REMOVE

2002-12-23 Thread Darci Antônio Tartari
REMOVE - Enviado pelo Correio da SUPRG utilizando IMP 3.1 http://horde.org/imp/

Skipstamp?

2002-12-23 Thread Scott Smith
I just checked out the 2.2 branch and set it up on a machine here...It built just fine and I got the virtdomain stuff working fine. My only problem is that I am getting the DBERROR messages about /var/imap/db/skipstamp. mkimap didn't create the file, and the only place I can find it in the code i

Problems creating mailboxes in 2.1.x

2002-12-23 Thread Matt Sealey
I've just set up my 2.x server and it's working great (authenticating and so on.. the most annoying part :) apart from mailboxes and folders. >From a clean system (cleaned out folders, ran mkimap), if I log in as "cyrus", run cyradm, and cm user.bob, when I look at the list of folders in Outlook,

Re: Too many open file in 2.2 (Re: Exploding number of cyrus processes)

2002-12-23 Thread Freerk J. Bosscha
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Priority: NORMAL X-Mailer: Execmail for Win32 5.1.1 Build (10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" I will send you those requested outputs also. Currently our institute is closed so I think the problem will not occur. As soon as this ha

ÈËÈ˸ÃÓУ¬¼Ò¼ÒÐèÒª¡ª¡ª³¬µÍ¼Û180ԪΪÄúÖÆ×ö¸÷ÀàÍøÕ¾£¡

2002-12-23 Thread ÖлªÐÅÍø
180ԪΪÄúÖÆ×÷¸÷ÀàÍøÕ¾ 1¡¢ÆóÒµÍøÕ¾£º²úÆ·ÉÌÎñչʾÍƽé 2¡¢ÉÌÎñÍøÕ¾£º½»Á÷¡¢ºÏ×÷¡¢Õ¹Ê¾¡¢¹µÍ¨¡¢´´Òµ¡¢ÈÚ×Ê¡¢¾¡Õ¹ÉÌÎñ¹¦ÄÜ 3¡¢¹ã¸æÍøÕ¾£º²úÆ·¡¢ÊÂÒµ¡¢ÐÅÏ¢¡¢Ðû´«Íƹã 4¡¢ÇóÖ°ÍøÕ¾£ºÇóÖ°ÕßÂÄÀú»Ø·Å¡¢¾«²Êչʾ 5¡¢¼ÒÍ¥ÍøÕ¾£º¼ÒÍ¥ÕÕƬ¼ÇÊ¡¢ÎÂÜ°ÁôÄî 6¡¢ÁµÈËСÎÝ£ºËêÔÂÁôºÛ¡¢°®ÐÄÊéд¡¢ÓÀºã¼Í