Re: vacation auto responders

2002-01-18 Thread Jeremy Howard
Ken Murchison wrote: > Agreed. I'm going to add the Precedence header check momentarily. We > are going to skip the List- header check because it would be difficult > to implement given the current cmu-sieve architecture, and this check > doesn't seem to be in wide use. > Our system includes the

Re: BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Igor Brezac wrote: > Will cyrus sasl 2.1.0 work with DB4? Cyrus SASL does not use the transaction API of DB4, so there shouldn't be any problems with it. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyer

Re: BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > We threw this check in there before DB4 was released, not knowing that > the txn API had (or was going to be) changed. > Will cyrus sasl 2.1.0 work with DB4? -Igor

Re: BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > The latest released verision (2.1.1) does not. There is a patch for DB4 > support in 2.1.1 on this list. This patch has been applied to CVS, so > the next release (2.1.2) will have it. > This is strange because configure tests for db-4. -Igor

Re: BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
OCNS Consulting wrote: > > Does the latest version of Cyrus IMAP 2.2.1 support BerkeleyDB 4.0? The latest released verision (2.1.1) does not. There is a patch for DB4 support in 2.1.1 on this list. This patch has been applied to CVS, so the next release (2.1.2) will have it. Ken -- Kenneth

Re: BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
Igor Brezac wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > The latest released verision (2.1.1) does not. There is a patch for DB4 > > support in 2.1.1 on this list. This patch has been applied to CVS, so > > the next release (2.1.2) will have it. > > > > This is strange because

Re: IMAPD 2.1.0 compilation with BerkeleyDB 4.0.14

2002-01-18 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:15:22 -0500, > OCNS Consulting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (oc) writes: oc> Do you use LDAP? If so, did you recompile LDAP to use SleepyCat 4.0? We do LDAP, but it's iPlanet DS. -- Amos

RE: IMAPD 2.1.0 compilation with BerkeleyDB 4.0.14

2002-01-18 Thread OCNS Consulting
Do you use LDAP? If so, did you recompile LDAP to use SleepyCat 4.0? RB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Amos Gouaux Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IMAPD 2.1.0 compilation with BerkeleyDB 4.0.14

Re: IMAPD 2.1.0 compilation with BerkeleyDB 4.0.14

2002-01-18 Thread Amos Gouaux
So, I thought I'd try BerkeleyDB 4.0.14 with cyrus-imapd out of CVS. I was curious to see how it would handle the existing 3.3.11 db files. Unless I'm mistaken, it looks almost as if it automatically converted/upgraded/whatever the db files to 4.0.14. Is that true? When I first started things u

BerkeleyDB 4.0

2002-01-18 Thread OCNS Consulting
Does the latest version of Cyrus IMAP 2.2.1 support BerkeleyDB 4.0? RB OCNS, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vacation auto responders

2002-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:49:26AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > > Scott Russell wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott Russell wrote: > > > > > My first concern is that vacation NOT respon

Re: vacation auto responders

2002-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > > Scott Russell wrote: > > > > > > Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and > > > everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked > > > as expecte

Re: vacation auto responders

2002-01-18 Thread Scott Russell
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:41:31AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Scott Russell wrote: > > > > Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and > > everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked > > as expected. > > > > With the vacation setup, wh

[no subject]

2002-01-18 Thread Robert B. Gault
I am currently in the process of setting up mail services.  I am trying to decide which IMAP server to run, either Cyrus or UW.   I intend to run the server on a PIII 700 w/ 256meg RAM w/ Red Hat 7.2.  There will be approximately 100 users of the system.  I will need to be able to offer w

Re: vacation auto responders

2002-01-18 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: > > Okay, I've got the sieve stuff from 2.1.x CVS build under 2.0.16 and > everything seems to be running fine. A few test scripts I setup worked > as expected. > > With the vacation setup, what will it NOT respond to. I've some of this > listed in the draft but I'm lookin

Re[2]: Cyrus+PAM+RADIUS

2002-01-18 Thread Pavel A Crasotin
BT> Pavel A Crasotin schrieb am Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:28:11AM +0300: >> Hi >> >> I've installed cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 with cyrus-sasl-1.5.27 >> on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE from the ports. >> I would like to authorize mail users with RADIUS. >> So I've configured >> >> imapd.conf: >> sasl_pwcheck_metho