Re: [HTTPS-E Rulesets] please give pointers on: "uri.host is explosive!"

It used to be WARN, it was fixed in the stable branch in 3.4.3. That line of code was once upon a time buggy, which explains the over-excited nature of the message. So yes, it should say "Exception in". Sometimes one forgets when debugging by printf that innoccent people are going to see and be

[HTTPS-E Rulesets] Visible Measures: cdn may be broken

To whom it may concern: It appears that cdn.visiblemeasures.com moved to Internap at some point (bucket = vmc.http.internapcdn.net according to CNAME). This causes it no longer to work, and coverage of the entire domain needs to be removed as far as I know. I haven't yet checked the possibility t

Re: [HTTPS-E Rulesets] Visible Measures: cdn may be broken

Some rulesets have comments saying that we don't care about breaking tracking. I don't know if that extends to ads. I can't see that request, since I choose to disable Flash. But accessing that domain over HTTPS seems to work OK. -- Brian Drake All content created by me: Copyright