Nick Chorley wrote:
Hi people,
I had a look in the archives first, but couldn't find anything about
this. Is it ok to use glibmm-2.6.1?
2.6.1 should be ok and i guess required if you want to use gtkmm-2.6.x ...
The gtkmm site says glibmm-2.6.x is
stable, but the readme file in the archive
Hi,
in the constructor, there is no size allocated for your widgets, so the
TreeView does not know how large it will be when shown. Try adding your
code into the on_realize event of the container, the widget sizes are
allocated at this point.
- Armin
After reading all your post on sigc++ i'm more confused than before.
Issue here is not can c++ solve this problem with new keywords tomorrow,
or do other libs have same problem, but can gtkmm/sigc++ safely be used
in commercial software at this point. I see there is large list of
companies using it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again...
I have compiled this example:
http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/tutorial/html/ch08s07.html#id2500544
And I have added in examplewindow.cc, at the end of the constructor this
line:
for(guint i = 0; i < 2; i++)
{
Gtk::TreeVi
Hi people,
I had a look in the archives first, but couldn't find anything about
this. Is it ok to use glibmm-2.6.1? The gtkmm site says glibmm-2.6.x is
stable, but the readme file in the archive I downloaded says, "This is
the unstable version of gtkmm, aimed at Gtk+ 2.0.x". I just want to be
