Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-05 Thread Gaius Mulley
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Basically here is a patch for -me which allows the preprocessors: > > tbl, eqn, gremlin to so something sensible with me based source > > files. It also fixes titles, headings, paragraphs, indented > > paragraphs, keeps, indices and a few other macro

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Basically here is a patch for -me which allows the preprocessors: > tbl, eqn, gremlin to so something sensible with me based source > files. It also fixes titles, headings, paragraphs, indented > paragraphs, keeps, indices and a few other macros. Applied to the CVS (with minor modifications).

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-04 Thread Gaius Mulley
Hi Werner and Zvezdan, here is a patch to help grohtml translate -me documents into html. It also fixes the bug as reported by Zvezdan on the 2nd of January. More cheating as ESR might put it :-) It handles the preprocessors gremlin, tbl, eqn and macros for titles, section headings, indices, ip,

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-04 Thread Gaius Mulley
Hi, not sure if my previous email made it to the outside world so here it goes again (apologies if multiple copies arrive). Basically here is a patch for -me which allows the preprocessors: tbl, eqn, gremlin to so something sensible with me based source files. It also fixes titles, headings, pa

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-02 Thread Gaius Mulley
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After this point all the letters are too small for comfortable reading. > > Questions: > - This is not a too complicated paragraph, yet is it broken in > two paragraphs at "interpretation of". Why? Hi, it is missing the html specials

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-02 Thread Gaius Mulley
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I personally use groff for PDF and PostScript documents, so I did > > not care for grohtml too much. The recent discussion about > > doclifter prompted me to recheck, and it seems to be a little -ms > > centric. > > This is correct. The -me macros

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I personally use groff for PDF and PostScript documents, so I did > not care for grohtml too much. The recent discussion about > doclifter prompted me to recheck, and it seems to be a little -ms > centric. This is correct. The -me macros don't have special support for HTML. Baically, it's nec

Re: [Groff] grohtml and non-ms macros

2007-01-02 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is a part of a paragraph from an -me document. BTW, doclifter lifts -me documrnts. It doesn't di a very good job, however; me macros don't carry as much structural info as man, ms, or mm. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond