On Monday, 11 July 2022 09:15:07 BST Damian McGuckin wrote:
> I think the issue is that the more recent packages have the Type 1 font
> as a t1.
Hi Damian,
The .t1 files are in fact postscript binary fonts, just not named .pfb. The
naming does not matter
and when groff is built it will look for
Hi Damian,
At 2022-07-11T18:15:07+1000, Damian McGuckin wrote:
> I think the issue is that the more recent packages have the Type 1
> font as a t1.
I'm not convinced that the file extension is the problem, but it does
seem like the CentOS distribution you're using is following Adobe's lead
in dep
I think the issue is that the more recent packages have the Type 1 font
as a t1.
Rather than screwing around with legacy packages, what is the best way
to go from t1 to pfb please because certainly groff wants .pfb.
The question then, is where should we put them, not only for 'groff' but
als
It seems there is a package
urw-base35-fonts-legacy
which installs the files in question in
/usr/share/X11/fonts/urw-fonts
I will try and install them, symbolically
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
to that directory and go through the whole exercise again.
It would b
I grabbed the fonts from CentOS 7.6 in
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
and copied them onto my CentOS 7.9 system.
I then reran 'configure' in 1.22.4 with
--with-urw-fonts-dir=/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
as an argument, and reinstalled things.
I recreated the file
Hi Deri,
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, Deri wrote:
Looking at your bad-sqrt.pdf you can see that ghostscript has embedded
the two Times-Roman fonts, but not the symbol font. This means that
whichever viewer you use needs to find a useable symbol font itself,
since it is not embedded.
That is my und
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
I used to use Evince exclusively, but in bullseye it has a serious
defect where the sidebar is no longer resizable, so I tend to use Okular
these days.
Eons ago, I used Okular. Then, with the move to CentOS over a Decade ago,
moved to 'evince'.
Hi Branden,
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
The source code is:
.ps 12
.vs 14
.nf
.EQ
p ~ = ~ q times sqrt { ( 1 + ~ (x / (q * q) ) }
.EN
The output on Windows with Acrobat had a long tail to the square root
sign over the top of the whole expression.
It appears from the pag
Hi Damian,
At 2022-07-09T16:43:06+1000, Damian McGuckin wrote:
> The source code is:
>
> .ps 12
> .vs 14
> .nf
> .EQ
> p ~ = ~ q times sqrt { ( 1 + ~ (x / (q * q) ) }
> .EN
>
> The output on Windows with Acrobat had a long tail to the square root
> sign over the top of the whole expression.
It
The source code is:
.ps 12
.vs 14
.nf
.EQ
p ~ = ~ q times sqrt { ( 1 + ~ (x / (q * q) ) }
.EN
The output on Windows with Acrobat had a long tail to the square root sign
over the top of the whole expression.
Okular has just a simple square root sign on the left of the expression,
i.e. no enc
I recently upgraded to CentoS 7.9. Sadly, Ghostscript no longer renders to
an X11 screen.
I use Groff 1.22.4, standard configure.
I have a PDF file while displays nicely using Acrobat reader on Windows
but does not render properly wioth 'evince' 3.28.2, for example the tiny
PDF file attach
11 matches
Mail list logo
