Re: .EM found missing

2020-11-23 Thread Larry McVoy
As a troff guy from the 1980's, I still have the docs that the computer science department at UW Madison put in my hands. I just love that people are trying to make troff better. Larry rocks. I wish more people knew this. On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:55:17PM -0500, Larry Kollar wrote: > > \G. Br

Re: .EM found missing

2020-11-23 Thread Larry Kollar
\G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > At 2020-11-15T14:13:38+, Dorai Sitaram via wrote: >> UTP strongly hints that the -ms macros have the end-of-input trap .em >> pre-set to a defined macro called .EM, with the implication that if >> the user wants to affect end-of-input behavior they can append

Re: .EM found missing

2020-11-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2020-11-15T14:13:38+, Dorai Sitaram via wrote: > UTP strongly hints that the -ms macros have the end-of-input trap .em > pre-set to a defined macro called .EM, with the implication that if > the user wants to affect end-of-input behavior they can append or > prepend to this macro rather than

.EM found missing

2020-11-15 Thread Dorai Sitaram via
UTP strongly hints that the -ms macros have the end-of-input trap .em pre-set to a defined macro called .EM, with the implication that if the user wants to affect end-of-input behavior they can append or prepend to this macro rather than messing with .em directly. However groff's s.tmac sets its