At 2023-10-14T18:04:47+0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> I added a RedirectMatch directive similar to the one above to the
> site-wide .htaccess. Now the html_node URLs work.
Thanks, Thérèse. I'm afraid I may need still more help.
I'm trying to .htaccess some spot fixes for known stale URLs on the
Le 06/10/2023 à 23:14, G. Branden Robinson a écrit :
[...]
At 2023-10-06T10:31:55+0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
There are other ways to redirect the html_node directory without any
help from sysadmins or webmasters.
* Create an .htaccess file, for example in the manual directory:
Redirect
Hi Gavin, Ingo, Dave, and Thérèse,
Thanks to all of you for your feedback, patience, and advice.
At 2023-09-30T20:10:01+0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:15:09PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > As for why I chose the name I did, that was simply an ab initio
> > s
Le 02/10/2023 à 21:37, Gavin Smith a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 06:53:30PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
So while changing the name of the directory back to html_node will fix
some broken link problems, it won't fix them all, and it won't be robust
in the face of future development. I'
Hi Branden,
G. Branden Robinson wrote on Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 06:53:30PM -0500:
> So while changing the name of the directory back to html_node will fix
> some broken link problems, it won't fix them all, and it won't be robust
> in the face of future development. I'm fairly neutral on the
> "ht
On 9/30/23, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I've been working for a while on paring the groff Texinfo manual's scope
[...]
> though I think I want to retain
> the comprehensive survey of ms, in a reversal from my thoughts in 2021.
What caused the reversal? It's long seemed weird to me to treat ms
d
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 06:53:30PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> So while changing the name of the directory back to html_node will fix
> some broken link problems, it won't fix them all, and it won't be robust
> in the face of future development. I'm fairly neutral on the
> "html_node" vs.
[self-follow-up]
At 2023-09-30T15:59:13-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I concede that having a working "/html_node/" URL by hook or by crook
> (or by symlink) is probably a good idea given the list of URLs linking
> to it that you presented above.
I find I have a problem with this after all,
[dropping the external Cc:s to avoid boring uninvolved parties]
Hi Branden,
G. Branden Robinson wrote on Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 03:59:13PM -0500:
> At 2023-09-30T22:07:44+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1189607/FULLTEXT01.pdf
> This link was of particula
Hi Ingo,
At 2023-09-30T22:07:44+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Now that i see this bumpy ride explained at length, i realize the
> link on this overview page of mine is currently broken, too:
>
> https://mandoc.bsd.lv/links.html
>
> First paragraph, first line, second link ("manual").
> Rather p
Hi,
Gavin Smith wrote on Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 08:10:01PM +0100:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:15:09PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> 4. "They might have changed this by mistake."
>>
>> Sort of. I find the "html_node" name uglier, but if there's popular
>> demand to switch it (back
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 01:15:09PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At the time I wrote that, I was unaware that "html_node", spelled
> thus, was a solidified and inflexible convention of GNU
> documentation. (Where is this documented?) We resolved the problem
> for ourselves,
Hi Gavin & Thérèse,
At 2023-09-30T16:22:32+0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> > Hello Gavin,
> >
> > The new URL of the node version is
> > https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
> > And there is a mono version.
> >
> > A patch
Le 30/09/2023 à 17:22, Gavin Smith a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
Hello Gavin,
The new URL of the node version is
https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
And there is a mono version.
A patch is attached.
Best,
Thérèse
Do you know why they
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> Hello Gavin,
>
> The new URL of the node version is
> https://gnu.org/s/groff/manual/groff.html.node/
> And there is a mono version.
>
> A patch is attached.
>
> Best,
> Thérèse
Do you know why they made this change? They have
15 matches
Mail list logo
