Hi Ralph!
On 7/23/22 12:23, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
As hinted in recent mails to groff@ and linux-man@,
I'm going to inaugurate a new [sub]section for constants.
This seems a bad idea. They're quite at home in section 3.
Others disagree, with the argument that 3 is reserved fo
Hi Alejandro,
> As hinted in recent mails to groff@ and linux-man@,
> I'm going to inaugurate a new [sub]section for constants.
This seems a bad idea. They're quite at home in section 3.
> I think it should contain constants, normally represented by
> object-like macros in C. But it should als
Reported-by: "G. Branden Robinson"
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar
---
Hi all!
As hinted in recent mails to groff@ and linux-man@,
I'm going to inaugurate a new [sub]section for constants.
I think it should contain constants, normally represented by
object-like macros in C. But it should als