Peter Schaffter wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005, joerg van den hoff wrote:
hi all,
is there a way to reset refer settings somewhere 'downstream' if the
'upstream' defaults are no good?
specifically:
in my document I source a certain defaults file in which, upon different
other settings, one finds:
> > is there a way to reset refer settings somewhere 'downstream' if
> > the 'upstream' defaults are no good?
> >
> > specifically:
> >
> > in my document I source a certain defaults file in which, upon
> > different other settings, one finds:
> >
> > ...
> > .R1
> > database the_standard_database
On Wed, May 04, 2005, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> hi all,
>
> is there a way to reset refer settings somewhere 'downstream' if the
> 'upstream' defaults are no good?
>
> specifically:
>
> in my document I source a certain defaults file in which, upon different
> other settings, one finds:
>
>
hi all,
is there a way to reset refer settings somewhere 'downstream' if the
'upstream' defaults are no good?
specifically:
in my document I source a certain defaults file in which, upon different
other settings, one finds:
...
.R1
database the_standard_database
.R2
...
now, I want to set in th
> I think, if there's a problem with refer, it's the documentation.
> There's very little of it other than the manpage, and the manpage is
> a pure example of what can be both good and bad about manpages: it
> contains all the information you need, but in a form so terse you
> have to know the pro
On Sat Apr 2 10:29:34 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I wrote]
> > MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
> > status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I have
> > never heard about it or seen it used.
...
> There are two major academic traditions to deal with bib
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Fri Apr 1 23:42:51 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 01-Apr-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > In contemporary North American bibliographies, about five
> > > styles are "standard", though by no means the only ones used:
> > >
> > >
Mats Broberg wrote:
I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
bibliographic rules.
MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I h
> > I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
> > refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
> > bibliographic rules.
>
> MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
> status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I have
> n
On Fri Apr 1 23:42:51 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 01-Apr-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
...
> >
> > In contemporary North American bibliographies, about five
> > styles are "standard", though by no means the only ones used:
> >
> > AMA (American Medical Association)
> > APA
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005, Ted Harding wrote:
> I understand that the MLA style is the general "norm" for
> publications in the Humanities, to the extent that many
> Humanities journals either strongly recommend it or insist
> on it.
>
> To your above list you could also add, for instance, the
> AMA (A
On 01-Apr-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>> On Thu Mar 31 23:22:08 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom.
>> > Using the ms refer module as a starting point, I'm
>> > setting mom up to use MLA bi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Thu Mar 31 23:22:08 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
> > refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
> > bibliographic rules.
>
> MLA seems to be "Mo
On Thu Mar 31 23:22:08 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
> refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
> bibliographic rules.
MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of status (official
On Apr 1, 2005 10:30 AM, Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know, I write in Russian, and having an "and" in a reference
> doesn't help much, if it's a
> Russian reference ;)
Uh-oh. It's not really hardcoded -- treat this letter as an April joke :)
--
Regards, Wartan.
_
On Apr 1, 2005 8:22 AM, Peter Schaffter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this, short of changing
> refer.cpp's
>
> string join_authors_exactly_two = " and ";
>
> assertion to
>
> string join_authors_exactly_two = ", and ";
>
> I'd prefer to state
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:22:08PM -0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Blow, Joe, and John Doe
> ^
>
> By default, refer produces
>
> Blow, Joe and John Doe
>
> I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this.
I don't know if this helps, but in a document, it can be done as
.R1
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:22:08PM -0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > Blow, Joe, and John Doe
> > ^
> >
> > By default, refer produces
> >
> > Blow, Joe and John Doe
> >
> > I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this.
>
>
Hi.
I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
bibliographic rules.
It's going well, but I've encountered a small (and I do mean small)
snag. MLA rules state that when you have two authors, a comma
should com
19 matches
Mail list logo
