> the groff wiki website
>
> http://www.groff-wiki.info/
>
> does not exist any longer. So the link at
>
> gnu.org/software/groff
>
> should be removed.
Fixed, thanks.
Werner
Am Freitag, 3. August 2007 schrieb Ted Harding:
> There are a number of things I could usefully add to
> the Groff Wiki -- especially in the eqn domain, but
> also others.
>
> I've visited the Groff Wiki, but can;t work out how to
>
> a) Add a new topic (EqnTips) ob the front page
> b) Edit/add to
There are a number of things I could usefully add to
the Groff Wiki -- especially in the eqn domain, but
also others.
I've visited the Groff Wiki, but can;t work out how to
a) Add a new topic (EqnTips) ob the front page
b) Edit/add to an existing topic
It may be obvious to osme, but I'm nit used
Heinz-J?rgen Oertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please try
groff-wiki.info
or
www.groff-wiki.info
Heinz
Good beginning!
- Manas Laha
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
please try
groff-wiki.info
or
www.groff-wiki.info
Heinz
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
On Feb 1, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Larry Kollar wrote:
Robert Goulding wrote:
Has there been any movement on the groff wiki? Yet more interesting
snippets and tips have been posted recently - it would be nice to
preserve them somewhere accessible!
I've been adding the tips and other goodies I h
Robert Goulding wrote:
Has there been any movement on the groff wiki? Yet more
interesting snippets and tips have been posted recently - it would
be nice to preserve them somewhere accessible!
I've been adding the tips and other goodies I have archived -- in
fact, I had intended to poin
> Has there been any movement on the groff wiki? Yet more interesting
> snippets and tips have been posted recently - it would be nice to
> preserve them somewhere accessible!
Unfortunately, the great enthusiasm a few weeks ago appears to have
gone :-( Larry McVoy seems to be too busy (he has mo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:37:32PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Has there been any movement on the groff wiki? Yet more interesting
> > snippets and tips have been posted recently - it would be nice to
> > preserve them somewhere accessible!
>
> Unfortunately, the great enthusiasm a few we
Tadziu Hoffman wrote, quoting Larry Kollar:
>> If anyone wants to reprint an email of mine to the wiki,
>> that's fine with me.
>
> Same here. I guess that's the whole point of this list.
That goes for me too.
Since the list archive is already public, there doesn't seem to
be much point in aski
> If anyone wants to reprint an email of mine to the wiki,
> that's fine with me.
Same here. I guess that's the whole point of this list.
> And it's only fitting that the wiki itself is written in awk.
Indeed. There used to be a *roff-(subset)-workalike called awf,
the "Amazingly Workable Fo
Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2005 03:14 schrieb Larry Kollar:
>> Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
>>> It was discussed that having a groff community Wiki would be valuable.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I just configured it as a groff Wiki.
>>> It can be reached at http://www.port.de/cgi-bin/g
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2005 03:14 schrieb Larry Kollar:
> Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
> > It was discussed that having a groff community Wiki would be valuable.
> > ...
> >
> > I just configured it as a groff Wiki.
> > It can be reached at http://www.port.de/cgi-bin/groff
>
> I've thrown a couple
Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
It was discussed that having a groff community Wiki would be valuable.
...
I just configured it as a groff Wiki.
It can be reached at http://www.port.de/cgi-bin/groff
I've thrown a couple of suggestions into AddTopics and finished out
the list of standard macro p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 29.10.05 01:18:02:
>
> The following shar archive contains the lbl preprocessor for
> [nt*]roff. lbl handles generation of and symbolic references to
> sequenced labels, alphabetic, numeric, or mixed. Forward
> references are supported.
>
The cited original
On 28-Oct-05 Larry Kollar wrote:
>
> Bernd Warken wrote:
>
>>
>> There is a wiki page with an article on groff:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff.
>
> There's a troff page, with a very familiar-sounding history,
> at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troff
>
>> It is quite small. The German v
>
> There is a wiki page with an article on groff:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff.
>
> It is quite small. The German version
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff
> is different and much larger.
Aah, thanks, will have a look. Anyway, Wikipedia is probably not the
right place for a gro
On 28-Oct-05 Bernd Warken wrote:
>
> There is a wiki page with an article on groff:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff.
>
> It is quite small. The German version
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff
> is different and much larger. Strangely enough, it comments
> `lbl' as supported preproc
Bernd Warken wrote:
There is a wiki page with an article on groff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff.
There's a troff page, with a very familiar-sounding history,
at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troff
It is quite small. The German version
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff
is differe
Ted Harding wrote:
On 28-Oct-05 Robert Goulding wrote:
...it seems to me that a wiki for
groff would be very useful. ...
This is a good idea! I've often thought of putting such things
somewhere, for people to consult or to incorporate into more
systematic
documentation about different as
There is a wiki page with an article on groff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff.
It is quite small. The German version
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff
is different and much larger. Strangely enough, it comments `lbl' as supported
preprocessor.
Bernd Warken
__
> I'd also sound a note of caution, however. My local Linux User Group
> ( http://www.alug.org.uk ) has had a wiki going for some months now,
> and it has unfortunately been vandalised on occasion, [...]
>
> I don't know the best solution to this problem.
Normally, the front page is mildly protec
On 28-Oct-05 Robert Goulding wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific
stuff that is frequently posted to this list (most recently, T
On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific
stuff that is frequently posted to this list (most recently, Ted's
solution for pie-graphs), it seems to me that a
> > With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
> > teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific
> > stuff that is frequently posted to this list (most recently, Ted's
> > solution for pie-graphs), it seems to me that a wiki for groff
> > would be very usefu
On Oct 28, 2005, at 3:00 PM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
On 28-Oct-05 Robert Goulding wrote:
With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific
stuff that is frequently posted to this list (most recently,
Ted's solution f
On 28-Oct-05 Robert Goulding wrote:
> With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
> teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific
> stuff that is frequently posted to this list (most recently,
> Ted's solution for pie-graphs), it seems to me that a wiki for
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Robert Goulding wrote:
> With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
> teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific stuff
> that is frequently posted to this list (most recently, Ted's solution
> for pie-graphs),
With all the discussion recently on the need for groff documents
teaching fundamentals and techniques - and with all the terrific stuff
that is frequently posted to this list (most recently, Ted's solution
for pie-graphs), it seems to me that a wiki for groff would be very
useful. We could:
29 matches
Mail list logo
