> Von: "Werner LEMBERG"
>
> > To that end, what does de1 do that you can't define in a regular
> > troff macro?
>
> It's not clear to me what Bernd wanted to say – we already have a
> `de1' request.
I'm not totally sure, what you mean.
I didn't create de1 requests. I only defined the new re
> To that end, what does de1 do that you can't define in a regular
> troff macro?
It's not clear to me what Bernd wanted to say – we already have a
`de1' request.
Werner
Hi Blake,
> > I want to extend the groff language by a single .de1 without hurting
> > the compatibility.
>
> I think we'd all agree that no new primitive command should be added
> if that command can be accomplished by defining a regular troff macro.
> To that end, what does de1 do that you can't
Greetings,
I think we'd all agree that no new primitive command should be added if
that command can be accomplished by defining a regular troff macro. To
that end, what does de1 do that you can't define in a regular troff macro?
Thanks.
Blake McBride
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Bernd War
Hi,
I want to extend the groff language by a single .de1 without hurting the
compatibility.
In which file can I store this .de1 within the groff source?
It seems to be no tmac file, because it is about the groff language and not a
macro package.
Bernd Warken
