Re: [Groff] ctype.h in pipeline.c

2005-04-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I don't see any such calls in pipeline.c, so I think you are > correct; it is not necessary. Thanks, I've removed it. Werner ___ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff

Re: [Groff] ctype.h in pipeline.c

2005-04-18 Thread Jeff Conrad
> I was asked whether ctype.h should be included in > src/roff/groff/pipeline.c -- this is for MS-DOS and Windows only. It > seems to me that it is not necessary, right? I first saw it in groff 1.17--I have no idea why it was there (it wasn't in groff 1.11, but I have no record of intermediate ve

Re: [Groff] ctype.h in pipeline.c

2005-04-18 Thread Keith Marshall
On Monday 18 April 2005 5:25 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > I was asked whether ctype.h should be included in > src/roff/groff/pipeline.c -- this is for MS-DOS and Windows only. Can't imagine why. And why only for MS-DOS and Windows? It is equally appropriate for any system. > It seems to me that

[Groff] ctype.h in pipeline.c

2005-04-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I was asked whether ctype.h should be included in src/roff/groff/pipeline.c -- this is for MS-DOS and Windows only. It seems to me that it is not necessary, right? Werner ___ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo