Re: [Groff] composition operator

2007-03-15 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> Very nice, dankeschoen. The problem was, I didn't know of eqn > magic sdefine, as groff docs are in many places incomplete. > \[de] will do the job, yes. Well, "sdefine" is clearly described in groff's eqn manpage -- it works like "define". Anyhow, I guess most of groff's documentation expects

[Groff] composition operator

2007-03-14 Thread janez . zemva
I've forgotten to write to the mailing list my thanks for advice and complaint about missing docs on eqn's sdefine.

Re: [Groff] composition operator

2007-03-14 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> I need a composition operator in groff for math (centered > circle, not too big), but I can't find any suitable > candidates, the closest I've come to is \[Om]. \[ao] and > \[ci] are too big, but I haven't tried \s-2\[ci]\s+2 yet. > Is this the solution? Why do you say that the ring accent \[ao]

[Groff] composition operator

2007-03-14 Thread janez . zemva
I need a composition operator in groff for math (centered circle, not too big), but I can't find any suitable candidates, the closest I've come to is \[Om]. \[ao] and \[ci] are too big, but I haven't tried \s-2\[ci]\s+2 yet. Is this the solution?