Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-06-10 Thread Anton Shepelev
Tadziu Hoffmann: The error must have been introduced between 1.19.2 and 1.19.3, and it's a bug in the mm macros, not in troff, as you can see by sourc- ing the 1.19.2 mm macros with troff 1.20.1 (and vice versa). If you edit the current mm macros and move the addr

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> By the way, what about Jurgen Hogg, the author of m.tmac whose > e-mail is still in the file as the address to sent bug reports to? Jörgen Hägg has no longer time (and probably no interest too) to take care of mm, I believe. I've now changed the bug report address. Werner

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-12 Thread Anton Shepelev
Thanks to everybody )) and especially to Mike Bianchi for volunteering to fix the bug. By the way, what about Jurgen Hogg, the author of m.tmac whose e-mail is still in the file as the address to sent bug reports to? Anton

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Has thought been given to regression tests for groff? Yes. However, I lack time (and, admittedly, interest) to do that. Volunteers are highly welcomed. Werner

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-04 Thread Mike Bianchi
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:24:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > The 1.20.1 behavior is obviously wrong: [...] > > Since I don't use mm, I can only ask for contributors to provide a > fix. Is there anyone capable of checking whether Tadziu's suggestion > is correct? > > > Werner I wi

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-04 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote: > The error must have been introduced between 1.19.2 and 1.19.3, and > it's a bug in the mm macros Has thought been given to regression tests for groff? Using GhostScript it's fairly easy to get a pixmap for a particular page at the specified resolution. Comparing th

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The 1.20.1 behavior is obviously wrong: [...] Since I don't use mm, I can only ask for contributors to provide a fix. Is there anyone capable of checking whether Tadziu's suggestion is correct? Werner

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-03 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> I have found a difference in groff's behaviour on > my home computer (groff 1.19.2) and at work (groff > 1.20.1). Note the vertical spacing and the merging > of paragraphs: [snip] The 1.20.1 behavior is obviously wrong: in your second document, calling the header macro once breaks the behavior

Re: [Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-03 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Anton, > I have found a difference in groff's behaviour on my home computer > (groff 1.19.2) and at work (groff 1.20.1). Note the vertical spacing > and the merging of paragraphs: Just for info, I've had problems with -mm changing in the past, i.e. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/g

[Groff] Groff 1.19.2 and 1.20.1 differences

2010-05-03 Thread Anton Shepelev
Hello all, I have found a difference in groff's behaviour on my home computer (groff 1.19.2) and at work (groff 1.20.1). Note the vertical spacing and the merging of paragraphs: Here's the first test file: .de TP .. .de EOP .. .PGFORM 60n v 0n 1 .de HY .length antI \\*(}0 .in +\\n[antI]n .t