Re: [Groff] Git branching workflow

Bonjour Bertrand, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: |On Wed, Sep 17 2014 at 01:32:23 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso \ |wrote: |> Hello Bertrand, |[...] |> |> First i'm sorry that i didn't really test your work on the |> migration to autoxy. I personally declined completely to use |> these back around 200

Re: [Groff] Git branching workflow

Hi Steffen, On Wed, Sep 17 2014 at 01:32:23 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Hello Bertrand, [...] > > First i'm sorry that i didn't really test your work on the > migration to autoxy. I personally declined completely to use > these back around 2001 and rather spend about half a year writing > a pe

Re: [Groff] Git branching workflow (was: License for files with »ideal« parts)

Hello Bertrand, Bertrand Garrigues wrote: |On Tue, Sep 16 2014 at 11:19:41 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso \ |wrote: |> [1] |> |> Why does groff not take advantage of git(1) and introduce a second |> regular work branch? I think t

[Groff] Git branching workflow (was: License for files with »ideal« parts)

Hello Steffen, On Tue, Sep 16 2014 at 11:19:41 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > [1] > > Why does groff not take advantage of git(1) and introduce a second > regular work branch? I think that has been mentioned several > times on