Re: [PATCH v3] [grotty]: Use terminfo.

2025-04-01 Thread Lennart Jablonka
ping

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Alex, On Tue, 2025-04-01 at 12:18 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Overseers > > wrote: > > > The public inbox of gcc@ doesn't replace the archive, but rather > >

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Alex, On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Overseers wrote: > The public inbox of gcc@ doesn't replace the archive, but rather > complement it. That is, there exit both the archive and the public > inbox. I expect the same would be possible here. > > (On the other

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Alejandro Colomar
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:18:35PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Overseers > > wrote: > > > The public inbox of gcc@ doesn't replac

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Mark, On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Overseers > wrote: > > The public inbox of gcc@ doesn't replace the archive, but rather > > complement it. That is, there exit both the archive

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Marc Chantreux
hello Simon, On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:32:49AM -0400, Simon Marchi wrote: > I don't really use them, but here are some instructions: > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/_/text/mirror/ > > I'm sure it's possible one way or another to produce an mbox file from a > public-inbox mirror.

Re: public inbox for groff

2025-04-01 Thread Marc Chantreux
Hi Alejandro and thanks for your answer, On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > The public inbox of gcc@ doesn't replace the archive, but rather > complement it. That is, there exit both the archive and the public > inbox. I expect the same would be possible here.