Hi Colin,
At 2024-07-04T08:56:01+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> What are the plans for a 1.24 release?
I muttered some thoughts a few months ago.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2024-02/msg00054.html
> In general I think it's bad to drift into a habit of allowing too much
> time and too m
Hi Doug,
At 2024-07-04T07:56:40-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> The cited file is what would result from [groff /dev/null].
[...]
> Slight correction. groff needs one empty line of input, not zero
> lines, to produce proof.ps.
> Why is it in the groff distribution?
I don't think that it is. We s
Slight correction. groff needs one empty line of input, not zero lines, to
produce proof.ps. According to the postscript, it was made with grops 1.22.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Douglas McIlroy
Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Subject: what is /usr/share/doc/groff/proof.ps?
To:
The cited file is what would result from [groff /dev/null]. Why is it in
the groff distribution?
Doug
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:20:06PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2024-07-03T22:32:06+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think this is https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64438, right? If
> > experts advise that this patch is safe to cherry-pick in isolation (I
> > know neither -ms nor pic well),
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 05:13:14PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I've prepared a GNU Savannah query for all resolved tickets of Important
> severity whose fixes are expected in groff 1.24.[7] Some are fixes for
> regressions. Doug's message about "groff -ms -p" not working is one.
>
> If a
