Re: Groff documentation: short TOC numbering, and HTML #anchor tag bookmarkability

Hi Ian, At 2024-03-08T05:36:36+, ropers wrote: > I. > > It seems a little inconsistent that the Groff documentation's short TOC > > does not include the chapter numbers present in the long TOC. As far as I can tell, that's not

Re: more Groff documentation navigation fixes

Hi Ian, At 2024-03-08T01:53:14+, ropers wrote: > I think I forgot to send the below, unless I'm totally confused. > Not diffs this time, because I drafted these earlier: Diffs are not mandatory for small proposals like this. > In groff.texi, line 4059 appears to omit the "Next" entry. It cu

Re: Groff UTF-8 support? - Groff documentation section 5.1.9 Input Encodings

At 2024-03-08T20:08:57+, ropers wrote: > Thus spake DaveKempera: > > This took me a while to figure out at first too, and the procedure > > gained an extra step since that time (when groff.texi was converted > > to groff.texi.in to require preprocessing) so it's harder to figure > > out today:

Re: Groff UTF-8 support? - Groff documentation section 5.1.9 Input Encodings

> Previously on Ropers, He Wrote: >> The thing I've given up on was figuring out how to preview my >> edits to groff.texi Thus spake DaveKempera: > This took me a while to figure out at first too, and the procedure > gained an extra step since that time (when groff.texi was converted to > groff.te

Re: Groff UTF-8 support? - Groff documentation section 5.1.9 Input Encodings

At 2024-03-08T10:34:39-0600, Dave Kemper wrote: > On 3/8/24, ropers wrote: > > The thing I've given up on was figuring out how to preview my > > edits to groff.texi > > This took me a while to figure out at first too, and the procedure > gained an extra step since that time (when groff.texi was c

Re: Groff UTF-8 support? - Groff documentation section 5.1.9 Input Encodings

On 3/8/24, ropers wrote: > The thing I've given up on was figuring out how to preview my > edits to groff.texi This took me a while to figure out at first too, and the procedure gained an extra step since that time (when groff.texi was converted to groff.texi.in to require preprocessing) so it's

Re: Groff UTF-8 support? - Groff documentation section 5.1.9 Input Encodings

> > > On 3/7/24, ropers wrote: > > >> "latin1" sounds awfully ISO-8859-1ish, and (I fear) not very much like > > >> the Latin-1 Supplement Unicode block > > > > > On 07/03/2024, Dave Kemper wrote: > > > Correct. Since there are two different things that include "Latin-1" > > > in their name, perh