Re: Wanted: testers for heavily revised grog(1)

2021-06-30 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2021-06-30T13:29:09+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > G. Branden Robinson wrote on Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:15:47PM +1000: > > > Since we've dropped groffer from the forthcoming groff release, I expect > > we'll be advising people more to use grog to help them figure out groff > > command lines, and

Re: Wanted: testers for heavily revised grog(1)

2021-06-30 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Branden, G. Branden Robinson wrote on Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:15:47PM +1000: > Since we've dropped groffer from the forthcoming groff release, I expect > we'll be advising people more to use grog to help them figure out groff > command lines, and so the quality of its implementation is importa

Re: Reverting various commits

2021-06-30 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Branden, G. Branden Robinson wrote on Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:32:35PM +1000: > At 2021-06-28T15:53:48+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: [...] >> I realize that non-continuous rendering mode is very important for >> PostScript and PDF output, but i don't really care what it does on >> the terminal. I

Re: Reverting various commits

2021-06-30 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi, Ingo! At 2021-06-28T15:53:48+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hello Branden, > > G. Branden Robinson wrote on Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:36:18AM +1000: > I didn't mean to ask that bugs remain unfixed. I'm merely used to a > working regime where, if a regression is found in a commit that mixes > bug

Wanted: testers for heavily revised grog(1)

2021-06-30 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi folks, Over the past several days I've been hacking heavily on grog. I've fixed 9 of the 10 outstanding Savannah tickets against it (leaving a wish list item I filed myself) and, I believe, greatly improved its quality and accuracy. For example, it now correctly recognizes all of the *roff do