Re: Releasing groff 1.23.0?

2021-04-17 Thread Dave Kemper
Branden, Your checklist looks great. I would add: P. The question posed in http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58930#comment10 and addressed in follow-up comment #11 should have a definitive answer (even if that answer is "leave things as they are for 1.23"). I think I still favor reverting and then

Re: problem with groff.texi: @ref{} in PDF and HTML fomats

2021-04-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
[following up after nearly a year] At 2020-05-27T23:37:29+1000, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Hi Gavin, > > Please accept my apologies for the delay. I kept wanting to produce a > reduced version of the groff Texinfo manual I've finally managed to do this; I've cut down the groff Texinfo manual

Re: groff_man subsections in HTML: indentation and TOC

2021-04-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi, Hans! At 2021-04-17T12:09:00+0200, Hans Unzner wrote: > Thanks very much, Branden! > This change also creates HTML-tags already. So there is no > need to change the HTML output driver at this point. Right--not in this respect, at least. > Does this change go into the official release or do

Re: Release Candidate 1.23.0.rc1

2021-04-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Oliver, At 2021-04-17T14:26:55+0200, Oliver Corff wrote: > Hi Branden, > > thank you so much for your meticulous work! You're welcome--but I can't help it! > I may not be aware of the latest developments but I just noticed under > "Miscellaneous" that groffer has been deleted from the distri

Re: groff_man subsections in HTML: indentation and TOC

2021-04-17 Thread Hans Unzner
Thanks very much, Branden! This change also creates HTML-tags already. So there is no need to change the HTML output driver at this point. Does this change go into the official release or do I have to patch it always on my system? Another thing that shows up with that extension is the indenta