Re: [groff] 01/04: nroff(1): Fix style and content issues.

2018-11-13 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Branden, G. Branden Robinson wrote on Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 09:59:20PM -0500: > commit b447d738fb65168ef8ccda2a89555425ebe6aa4a > Author: G. Branden Robinson > Date: Tue Nov 13 11:36:13 2018 -0500 [...] > + Set "@g@nroff", "groff", "grotty", and "locale"(1) in > italics, no

Re: [groff] RFC: replace doc/webpage.ms or "evergreen" it

2018-11-13 Thread Dave Kemper
On 11/8/18, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > doc/webpage.ms is a nice example of how to do some fairly sophisticated > stuff with groff, putting groff color extensions and the www macro > package on top of the classical ms macro package to make an attractive > hypertext document. > > ...but it is a ma

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-13 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2018-11-12T16:58:24+, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Branden, > > > The Version 7 Unix pages are a wonderful thing but they are not the > > final word on current or best practice. > > They show that OPTIONS was not in 7th Ed.'s section 1, despite some > commands, like ls(1) having many options

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-13 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2018-11-12T11:09:10-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > > Hi Branden, > > > > Can you try and spend time halving the amount you write, otherwise I > > suspect the length puts off other contributors. :-) > > When I don my editor's hat, I agree with Ralp

Re: [groff] bug-groff autoresponder?

2018-11-13 Thread Dave Kemper
> Yes. I would add you as an additional administrator, thus giving you > write access to the list data. Sounds good. Happy to look into the bug-groff setup and help out wherever else I can.

Re: [groff] bug-groff autoresponder?

2018-11-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Dave, do you want to become admistrator of the `groff' and >> `bug-groff' mailing lists? > > I'm willing to, though if they frequently need prompt administrative > intervention, I may not be best suited for it (as the tardiness of > this reply illustrates). No problem! Most actions (like appr