Re: [groff] bug-groff autoresponder?

2018-11-12 Thread Dave Kemper
On 11/8/18, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> Is it possible to configure bug-groff to autorespond to any email >> that doesn't come from the Savannah bug tracker, telling the sender >> that the tracker is the preferred place to report groff bugs? > > Probably yes. Dave, do you want to become admistrator

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-12 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Branden, > The Version 7 Unix pages are a wonderful thing but they are not the > final word on current or best practice. They show that OPTIONS was not in 7th Ed.'s section 1, despite some commands, like ls(1) having many options. > Implement the system documented there and you'll be rooted i

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-12 Thread Peter Schaffter
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Branden, > > Can you try and spend time halving the amount you write, otherwise I > suspect the length puts off other contributors. :-) When I don my editor's hat, I agree with Ralph. However, as a contributor to and avid reader of the list, I ha

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-12 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2018-11-12T14:59:45+, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Branden, Hi Ralph! > Can you try and spend time halving the amount you write, otherwise I > suspect the length puts off other contributors. :-) I favor brevity, when manageable. A defense brief is a challenge. I'll try to be terser here.

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-12 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Branden, Can you try and spend time halving the amount you write, otherwise I suspect the length puts off other contributors. :-) > > OPTIONS is not a standard section, not at all: I agree with Ingo. > In the absence of a standard, for man(7) we must look to common > practice. > > On my Deb

Re: [groff] 01/04: grn(1): Make options discussion a section.

2018-11-12 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2018-11-12T07:23:04+0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Branden, > > G. Branden Robinson wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:57:41PM -0500: > > > commit 75205acd4f5c7586199e7b19fa61971fd3b31e19 > > Author: G. Branden Robinson > > Date: Tue Nov 6 12:43:12 2018 -0500 > > > > grn(1): Make option

Re: [groff] 02/04: Stop spelling "Unix" as "UNIX".

2018-11-12 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Branden, G. Branden Robinson wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:22:47AM -0500: > Do you think it might be worth capturing any of that in the groff tree > somewhere? Even if only as comments in mdoc's tmac files? I think it might make sense to: - Mark .Ux as deprecated in groff_mdoc(7). - Fo

Re: [groff] 02/04: Stop spelling "Unix" as "UNIX".

2018-11-12 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2018-11-12T06:19:40+0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Branden, [much juicy historical information about mdoc snipped] > I think with respect to mdoc, you made the right decisions. Hi Ingo! Thanks very much for that detailed analysis. Your knowledge of the history, implementation, and corpus o